Literature DB >> 9054250

Predicting difficult intubation with indirect laryngoscopy.

K Yamamoto1, T Tsubokawa, K Shibata, S Ohmura, S Nitta, T Kobayashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not always possible to predict when tracheal intubation will be difficult or impossible. The authors wanted to determine whether indirect laryngoscopy could identify patients in whom intubation was difficult.
METHODS: Indirect laryngoscopy was done in 2,504 patients. The Wilson risk sum score and the modified Mallampati score were also studied in a different series of 3,680 patients for comparison. These predictive methods were compared according to three parameters: positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity.
RESULTS: Of 6,184 patients studied, the trachea proved difficult to intubate in 82 (1.3%). Positive predictive value (31%) and specificity (98.4%) with indirect laryngoscopy were greater than the other two predictive methods (P < 0.01), whereas sensitivity with indirect laryngoscopy (69.2%) was greater than that of the Wilson risk sum score (55.4%) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although in 15% of patients indirect laryngoscopy could not be performed because of excessive gag reflex, indirect laryngoscopy can serve as an effective method to predict difficult intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9054250     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Voluntary reporting system in anaesthesia: is there a link between undesirable and critical events?

Authors:  P Y Boëlle; P Garnerin; J F Sicard; F Clergue; F Bonnet
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

2.  Indirect laryngoscopic assessment for the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery.

Authors:  Meltem Türkay; Tülin Şentürk; Birsen Yigit Arslan; Hacer Yeter; Mehmet Salih Sevdi; Salih Aydın; Ismail Gergin; Kerem Erkalp
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-21

3. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  A comparison of the ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance with the modified Mallampati and the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Safavi; Azim Honarmand; Narges Zare
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

5.  Comparison of laser microsurgery and open partial laryngectomy for T1-2 laryngeal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Chunlin Luo; Kexing Lv; Qihong Liu; Yihui Wen; Meiya Lin; Zhangfeng Wang; Xiaolin Zhu; Aiyun Jiang; Weiping Wen; Wenbin Lei
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

6.  Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of THRIVE for Children Undergoing Airway Evaluation.

Authors:  Tyler S Okland; George S Liu; Thomas J Caruso; Douglas R Sidell
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-09-25

7.  The causes of difficult tracheal intubation and preoperative assessments in different age groups.

Authors:  Hyoung-Yong Moon; Chong Wha Baek; Jin-Seo Kim; Gill Hoi Koo; Jin-Yun Kim; Young-Cheol Woo; Yong Hun Jung; Hyun Kang; Hwa-Yong Shin; So-Young Yang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04-22

Review 8.  Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.

Authors:  Dominik Roth; Nathan L Pace; Anna Lee; Karen Hovhannisyan; Alexandra-Maria Warenits; Jasmin Arrich; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15

9.  The prediction of difficult intubation in obese patients using mirror indirect laryngoscopy: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Arne O Budde; Matthew Desciak; Venugopal Reddy; Octavio A Falcucci; Sonia J Vaida; Leonard M Pott
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04

10.  Comparison of thyromental height test with ratio of height to thyromental distance, thyromental distance, and modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study.

Authors:  Pratibha Panjiar; Anjali Kochhar; Kharat M Bhat; Mudassir A Bhat
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.