Literature DB >> 9052621

Limbus- versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in combined phacoemulsification and mitomycin C trabeculectomy surgery.

J S Berestka1, S V Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors compared the effectiveness of limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps in patients undergoing combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and mitomycin C trabeculectomy.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the records of 52 consecutive eyes of 45 patients who underwent combined surgery with limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps. All surgery was by done by one surgeon on predominantly white patients in a suburban glaucoma subspecialty practice. Seven patients had both limbus- and fornix-based surgery, permitting fellow eye comparisons in these patients. All patients had at least 6 months and a median of 17 months follow-up. None of the eyes that were operated on had undergone intraocular surgery previously.
RESULTS: No clinically significant difference in postoperative pressure reduction, bleb survival, or visual acuity was seen between the fornix- and limbus-based groups. Results in the fellow eye comparison subgroups were similar. The mean intraocular pressure decreased from 20.4 mmHg before surgery to a mean of 12.4 mmHg at the last follow-up visit. Forty-seven (90.3%) of 52 eyes had a final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/ 40 or better. Forty eyes (76.9%) no longer needed antiglaucoma medications at the end of follow-up. Five eyes had intraoperative posterior capsule rupture; all of these occurred in the limbus-based group. Shallow serous choroidal effusions were more common in the fornix-based group, but none were clinically significant. No difference in postoperative astigmatism between the limbus- or fornix-based group was seen. Intraoperative pupilloplasty, synechialysis, or postoperative neodymium:YAG capsulotomy had no appreciable effect on final intraocular pressure or bleb survival. Endophthalmitis, aqueous misdirection, or hypotony maculopathy did not develop in any patient.
CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps appears to be similar. The limbus-based technique may result in a higher incidence of posterior capsular rupture, but the safety of limbus- and fornix-based flaps is otherwise similar. Combined phacoemulsification and mitomycin C trabeculectomy appears to be safe and effective for treating selected patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052621     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30335-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of fornix- and limbus-based conjunctival flaps in mitomycin C trabeculectomy with laser suture lysis in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Takeo Fukuchi; Jun Ueda; Kiyoshi Yaoeda; Kieko Suda; Masaaki Seki; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Alex B Theventhiran; Gene Kim; WenJeng Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 3.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Limbus- versus fornix-based trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma eyes with prior ocular surgery: the Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study.

Authors:  Satoshi Yokota; Yuji Takihara; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Miao He; Minwen Zhou; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model.

Authors:  Cooper D Rodgers; Alissa M Meyer; Nicole C Rosenberg; Zachary L Lukowski; Jamie L Schaefer; Gina M Martorana; Monica A Levine; Craig A Meyers; Mark B Sherwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.