Literature DB >> 9052416

Histopathology of breast cancer in relation to age.

C J Fisher1, M K Egan, P Smith, K Wicks, R R Millis, I S Fentiman.   

Abstract

Histological reports of 1869 consecutive women with invasive breast cancer have been reviewed to determine whether histological features of the tumour's were related to the patients' age. The patients, treated between 1983 and 1992, were divided into four groups, based on age. There were 148 aged < or = 39 years, 355 aged 40-49 years, 984 aged 50-69 years and 382 aged 70 years or more. The most outstanding finding was the increase in incidence of grade III infiltrating ductal carcinoma in those aged < or = 39 years (P < 0.0001). Certain tumour types, in particular lobular, were reported more frequently in the oldest age group. Additionally, there was a significant reduction of axillary lymph node metastases, vascular invasion and lymphoplasmacytic stromal reaction with increasing age, all of which were independent of tumour grade. These data suggest that there may be age-related changes in the histology of breast cancer and, in some cases, less aggressive features in the elderly. However, as the life expectancy of women over the age of 70 may be many years, treatment should be based on histological prognostic features of the primary tumour rather than age alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052416      PMCID: PMC2063298          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  17 in total

1.  Further observations on prognostic factors in cancer of the female breast.

Authors:  S J Cutler; M M Black; T Mork; S Harvei; C Freeman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Breast carcinoma at the extremes of age: a comparison of patients younger than 35 years and older than 75 years.

Authors:  P P Rosen; M L Lesser; D W Kinne
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Breast carcinoma in elderly women: pathology, prognosis, and survival.

Authors:  G Schaefer; P P Rosen; M L Lesser; D W Kinne; E J Beattie
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1984

4.  The pathological findings of breast cancer in patients surviving 25 years after radical mastectomy.

Authors:  P J Dawson; D J Ferguson; T Karrison
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast. After mastectomy, radiotherapy or excisional biopsy alone.

Authors:  D Carter; S L Orr; M J Merino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Breast carcinoma in the elderly patient: an assessment of operative risk, morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  K E Hunt; D E Fry; K I Bland
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Prognosis in stage II (T1N1M0) breast cancer.

Authors:  P P Rosen; P E Saigo; D W Braun; E Weathers; D W Kinne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Natural killer (NK) activity in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with benign and malignant breast disease.

Authors:  D White; D B Jones; T Cooke; N Kirkham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The relative significance of prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Alderson; I Hamlin; M D Staunton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The cancer research campaign (King's/Cambridge trial for early breast cancer: clinico-pathological aspects.

Authors:  C W Elston; G A Gresham; G S Rao; T Zebro; J L Haybittle; J Houghton; G Kearney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  Breast cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  B Tessier Cloutier; A E Clarke; R Ramsey-Goldman; Y Wang; W Foulkes; C Gordon; J E Hansen; E Yelin; M B Urowitz; D Gladman; P R Fortin; D J Wallace; M Petri; S Manzi; E M Ginzler; J Labrecque; S Edworthy; M A Dooley; J L Senécal; C A Peschken; S C Bae; D Isenberg; A Rahman; G Ruiz-Irastorza; J G Hanly; S Jacobsen; O Nived; T Witte; L A Criswell; S G Barr; L Dreyer; G Sturfelt; S Bernatsky
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.

Authors:  Csaba Gajdos; Paul Ian Tartter; Ira J Bleiweiss; George Hermann; John de Csepel; Alison Estabrook; Alfred W Rademaker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development.

Authors:  Jingyao Lian; Ying Yue; Weina Yu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 17.388

4.  Age and axillary lymph node ratio in postmenopausal women with T1-T2 node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Sue A Joseph; Nadege Coutty; Bevan Hong Ly; Georges Vlastos; Nam Phong Nguyen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-10-07

5.  Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer is not affected by age.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Yeh; Yung-Ming Jeng; Cheng-Maw Ho; Rey-Heng Hu; Hsiu-Pi Chang; Yu-Wen Tien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; David Y Johnson; Karen S Johnson; Jay A Baker; Mary Scott Soo; E Shelley Hwang; Sujata V Ghate
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Management of operable breast cancer in older women.

Authors:  Ian S Fentiman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Clinicopathological characteristics of infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma in elderly women: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Alvaro Ruibal; Pablo Aguiar; Maria Del Camen Del Río; Primitiva Menéndez; José Ignacio Arias; Michel Herranz
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28

9.  Age-related tumor growth in mice is related to integrin α 4 in CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Juhyun Oh; Angela Magnuson; Christophe Benoist; Mikael J Pittet; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-11-02

10.  The impact of site-specific digital histology signatures on deep learning model accuracy and bias.

Authors:  Frederick M Howard; James Dolezal; Sara Kochanny; Jefree Schulte; Heather Chen; Lara Heij; Dezheng Huo; Rita Nanda; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Jakob N Kather; Nicole Cipriani; Robert L Grossman; Alexander T Pearson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.