Literature DB >> 9052293

Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. The Remifentanil/Alfentanil Outpatient TIVA Group.

B K Philip1, P E Scuderi, F Chung, T J Conahan, W Maurer, J J Angel, S K Kallar, E P Skinner, B D Jamerson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that using a 1:4 ratio of remifentanil to alfentanil, a remifentanil infusion would provide better suppression of intraoperative responses and comparable recovery profiles after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery than an alfentanil infusion, as part of total intravenous anesthesia. Two hundred ASA physical status I, II, or III adult patients participated in this multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to either the remifentanil-propofol or alfentanil-propofol regimens. The anesthesia sequence was propofol (2 mg/kg intravenously [IV] followed by 150 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), and either remifentanil (1 microgram/kg IV followed by 0.5 microgram.kg-1.min-1)of alfentanil (20 micrograms/kg IV followed by 2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), and vecuronium. After trocar insertion, infusion rates were decreased (propofol to 75 micrograms.kg-1.min-1; remifentanil to 0.25 microgram.kg-1.min-1; alfentanil to 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1). Alfentanil and propofol were discontinued at 10 and 5 min, respectively, before the anticipated end of surgery (last surgical suture); remifentanil was discontinued at the end of surgery. Recovery times were calculated from the end of surgery. The median duration of surgery was similar between groups (39 min for remifentanil versus 34 min for alfentanil). A smaller proportion of remifentanil patients than alfentanil patients had any intraoperative responses (53% vs 71%, P = 0.029), had responses to trocar insertion (11% vs 32%, P < 0.001), or required dosage adjustments during maintenance (24% vs 41%, P < 0.05). Early awakening times were similar. Remifentanil patients qualified for Phase 1 discharge later and were given postoperative analgesics sooner than alfentanil patients (P < 0.05). Actual discharge times from the ambulatory center were similar between groups (174 min for remifentanil versus 204 min for alfentanil) (P = 0.06). In conclusion, remifentanil can be used for maintenance of anesthesia in a 1:4 ratio compared with alfentanil, for total IV anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. This dose of remifentanil provides more effective suppression of intraoperative responses and does not result in prolonged awakening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052293     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199703000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of recovery characteristics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and gastrointestinal motility with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with desflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  B Cagla Ozbakis Akkurt; Muhyittin Temiz; Kerem Inanoglu; Ahmet Aslan; Selim Turhanoglu; Zeynel Asfuroglu; Elif Canbolant
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2009-04

Review 2.  Remifentanil: a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Spotlight on remifentanil for general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  [Remifentanil-based intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative pain therapy. Is there an optimal treatment strategy?].

Authors:  C Zöllner; M Schäfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Difference of the hemodynamic changes induced by tracheal intubation using remifentanil between smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Sung; Soo Bong Yu; Doo Sik Kim; Kyung Han Kim; Tae Ho Jang; Se Hwan Kim; Sie Jeong Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-06-23

6.  Comparison of the Effects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine Infusions on Hemodynamic Parameters and Thyroid Hormones.

Authors:  Bengü Özütürk; Ayşın Ersoy; Aysel Altan; Levent Mehmet Uygur
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-05-23

7.  Comparative induction of controlled circulation by magnesium and remifentanil in spine surgery.

Authors:  Mohammad R Ghodraty; Mohammad M Homaee; Kourosh Farazmehr; Ali R Nikzad-Jamnani; Masoud Soleymani-Dodaran; Ali R Pournajafian; Nader D Nader
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

8.  Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for minimizing cardiovascular changes by inhalation of desflurane.

Authors:  Hee Jin Jeong; Hee Jung Baik; Jong Hak Kim; Youn Jin Kim; Jae Hyon Bahk
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Randomized double-blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  José M Beleña; Mónica Núñez; Alfonso Vidal; Diego Anta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

10.  Comparison of intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery using either remifentanil or fentanyl as an adjuvant to general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kawano; Sawa Manabe; Tomomi Matsumoto; Eisuke Hamaguchi; Michiko Kinoshita; Fumihiko Tada; Shuzo Oshita
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.