Literature DB >> 9051891

Movement disturbances of the lumbar spine and abnormal back muscle electromyographic findings in recurrent low back pain.

T Sihvonen1, K A Lindgren, O Airaksinen, H Manninen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was done of patients with recurrent low back pain referring to the lower limbs.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze dynamic radiographs of forward and backward bending of the lumbar back and to determine, using routine neurophysiologic measurements, the functional state of the lower nerve roots in patients with recurrent low back pain radiating to the lower limbs.
METHODS: Clinical and neurophysiologic studies showed eight of the 108 patients with low back pain to have ventral root impingement at either L5 or S1 level. The remaining 100 patients, 56 women and 44 men (mean age, 37.6 years; range, 17-62 years), made up the study group for continuing investigation. History of low back pain ranged from 4 months to 20 years.
RESULTS: Disturbed intervertebral movement was found in 51 of 100 patients. Twenty-seven percent had L5 or L4 anterolisthetic hypermobility, and 35% had L4 or L3 vertebral retrolisthesis. Vaguely delineated radiating sensations in the lower limbs were common (62%). Back muscle electromyographs were mostly (86%) normal in patients whose low back pain was localized. Conversely, almost three-fourths of those experiencing radiating or referred pain had abnormal electromyographs, consistent with a mild degree of axonal damage in the posterior branch of the lumbar nerve root innervating the medial paraspinal muscles. This finding was most common among patients with retrolisthesis and simultaneous degenerative changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of low back pain should include tests for degenerative retrolisthesis, especially in patients experiencing radiating sensations with no evidence of root impingement, because abnormal electromyographic findings showing denervation of the paraspinal muscles was most common in patients with degenerative retrolisthesis. To improve the functional support of the lumbar region, rehabilitation should be directed to the medial back muscles because they provide the most effective support for intervertebral motion and because mild disturbances appear to be associated with their innervation in recurrent low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9051891     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199702010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; G Lorimer Moseley; Anna Gabrielsson; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  ROLLING REVISITED: USING ROLLING TO ASSESS AND TREAT NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND COORDINATION OF THE CORE AND EXTREMITIES OF ATHLETES.

Authors:  Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael L Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

3.  Kinematic analysis of dynamic lumbar motion in patients with lumbar segmental instability using digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Amir Ahmadi; Nader Maroufi; Hamid Behtash; Hajar Zekavat; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Exploratory evaluation of the effect of axial rotation, focal film distance and measurement methods on the magnitude of projected lumbar retrolisthesis on plain film radiographs.

Authors:  Roger R Coleman; Edward J Cremata; Mark A Lopes; Rick A Suttles; Vaughn R Fairbanks
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-12

5.  Effects of low back pain and of stabilization or movement-system-impairment treatments on induced postural responses: A planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Karen V Lomond; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-08-21

6.  Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of patient function.

Authors:  Kevin K Kang; Michael S Shen; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Afshin E Razi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Activations of deep lumbar stabilizing muscles by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation of lumbar paraspinal regions.

Authors:  Seung Ok Baek; Sang Ho Ahn; Rodney Jones; Hee Kyung Cho; Gil Su Jung; Yun Woo Cho; Hyeong Jun Tak
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-08-28

8.  Lumbar segmental mobility disorders: comparison of two methods of defining abnormal displacement kinematics in a cohort of patients with non-specific mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Julie M Fritz; Brendan McCane; Barry Shultz; Peter Herbison; Brett Lyons; Georgia Stefanko; Richard M Walsh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Exercise and tropism of the multifidus muscle in low back pain: a short review.

Authors:  Paolo Pillastrini; Silvano Ferrari; Silvia Rattin; Andrea Cupello; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Carla Vanti
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SEGMENTAL ROLLING ABILITY AND LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS ACTIVATION TIME.

Authors:  Nicole Clark; Michael L Voight; Ashley M Campbell; Sherry Pierce; Pat Sells; Ryan Cook; Clint Henley; Lindsey Schiller
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.