Literature DB >> 9051333

A within-patient comparison of subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in general practice.

K Gruffydd-Jones1, C A Hood, D B Price.   

Abstract

This study compared, for the first time in the United Kingdom, the efficacy and safety of oral 100 mg and subcutaneous 6 mg sumatriptan within a patient for the acute treatment of migraine. The patient's preference for the two formulations of sumatriptan were also recorded. The study was a multicentre, randomized, open, crossover design with an optional open parallel group extension. Individual attacks were treated with one formulation only. Over 70% of patients who treated attack 1 in both treatment periods of the crossover phase reported headache relief with each formulation at 4 h. Only 3% of patients failed to respond to at least one of the formulations at this time point. At the end of the crossover phase patient preference for the injection more than doubled from the pretreatment level in those patients who were previously naive to sumatriptan. During the optional phase of the study, 38% of patients chose to treat some attacks with oral and some with subcutaneous sumatriptan. The main reason for choosing injection was speed of relief, whilst convenience was the major reason for the use of the tablet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9051333     DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1701031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  4 in total

Review 1.  Needle-free subcutaneous sumatriptan: in the acute treatment of migraine attacks or cluster headache episodes.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Delivery systems for acute migraine medications.

Authors:  I Worthington
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Practical approaches to migraine management.

Authors:  Seymour Diamond; Richard Wenzel
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Preference and satisfaction with a 6-month subcutaneous injection versus a weekly tablet for treatment of low bone mass.

Authors:  D L Kendler; L Bessette; C D Hill; D T Gold; R Horne; S F Varon; J Borenstein; H Wang; H-S Man; R B Wagman; S Siddhanti; D Macarios; H G Bone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.