Literature DB >> 9050084

High dose pimozide does not block amphetamine-induced euphoria in normal volunteers.

L H Brauer1, H De Wit.   

Abstract

Studies with laboratory animals have shown that dopamine antagonists block the rewarding and interoceptive effects of amphetamine. However, studies using dopamine antagonists with humans have not consistently shown blockade of amphetamine-induced euphoria. The unexpected results in humans may relate to the low doses of dopamine antagonists tested. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a relatively high acute dose (8 mg) of the dopamine receptor antagonist, pimozide, on responses to d-amphetamine (10 and 20 mg) in normal volunteers. Male and female volunteers (N = 12) attended six sessions on which they received pimozide or placebo (7:30 am) followed by d-amphetamine or placebo (9:30 am). Subjective, physiological and behavioral measures were obtained at baseline (7:15 am) and hourly over a 5 h period. d-Amphetamine and pimozide, when administered alone, produced significant and opposite effects on ratings of Elation and Vigor, as well as on psychomotor performance and physiological measures. However, there were few significant interactions between pimozide and d-amphetamine. Thus, pimozide failed to consistently antagonize the effects of d-amphetamine, even at doses of pimozide that had behavioral and physiological effects when administered alone. Possible reasons for lack of robust dopamine antagonism of amphetamine-induced euphoria in humans are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9050084     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00240-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  34 in total

1.  Influence of aripiprazole pretreatment on the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; J Adam Bennett; Joshua A Lile; Rajkumar J Sevak; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

Review 6.  Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 7.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Atomoxetine attenuates dextroamphetamine effects in humans.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; James Poling; Kevin Hill; Thomas Kosten
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 9.  Human drug discrimination: A primer and methodological review.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Dopamine, behavioral economics, and effort.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Andrew M Farrar; Eric J Nunes; Marta Pardo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.