Literature DB >> 9048982

Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocytes in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with tick-borne encephalitis.

J Tomazic1, A Ihan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lymphocyte subsets were examined by flow cytometry in 33 patients with tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in order to determine their values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lymphocytes were isolated from CSF and lymphocyte subsets were determined: lymphocytes T (CD3+), lymphocytes B (CD19+), NK cells (CD3-CD56+), helper T cells (CD3+CD4+) and cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+). The expression of IL-2 receptors (CD25+) and transferrin receptors (CD71+) on T cells and HLA-DR molecules on T cell subsets was examined. Furthermore, possible relationships among different TBE patient population variables (gender, age, severity of disease, duration of meningitis) were considered.
RESULTS: The analyses of the CSF lymphocyte population subsets are presented. Lymphocytes T (CD3+) were significantly higher in the CSF than in the peripheral blood as was the case with the T cells that expressed transferrin receptors (CD71). Lymphocytes B (CD19+) and NK cells (CD3-CD56+) prevailed in the peripheral blood. In the early course of the disease, a higher expression of HLA-DR molecules on T lymphocytes was observed, while later a higher expression of IL-2 receptors (CD25+) was observed. DISCUSSION: Significant differences in lymphocyte subsets between the CSF and the peripheral blood were found. Significant time-dependent changes of CSF lymphocyte subsets during course of infection were observed. The results of the present study give us deeper insight into CNS cellular immunopathogenic mechanisms in patients with TBE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048982     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  5 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of immune responses to Russian spring-summer encephalitis and Omsk hemorrhagic fever viruses in mouse models.

Authors:  Bersabeh Tigabu; Terry Juelich; Michael R Holbrook
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.616

2.  Tick borne encephalitis without cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis.

Authors:  Daša Stupica; Franc Strle; Tatjana Avšič-Županc; Mateja Logar; Blaž Pečavar; Fajko F Bajrović
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  CXCL9 concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with tick-borne encephalitis.

Authors:  Olga M Koper; Joanna Kamińska; Sambor Grygorczuk; Joanna Zajkowska; Halina Kemona
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 4.  Cell-Mediated Immune Responses and Immunopathogenesis of Human Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Infection.

Authors:  Kim Blom; Angelica Cuapio; J Tyler Sandberg; Renata Varnaite; Jakob Michaëlsson; Niklas K Björkström; Johan K Sandberg; Jonas Klingström; Lars Lindquist; Sara Gredmark Russ; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Natural killer cell responses to emerging viruses of zoonotic origin.

Authors:  Carlos Diaz-Salazar; Joseph C Sun
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 7.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.