Literature DB >> 9048292

Recent advances in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparative study of electrosurgical snare electrode and ultrasound dissection.

O M Elashry1, J S Wolf, H J Rayala, E M McDougall, R V Clayman.   

Abstract

Although technically feasible, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) using conventional instrumentation presents the intraoperative challenge of hemostasis, creating a flush (i.e., precise guillotine) incision, and closure of the collecting system. In an effort to resolve these technical problems, we used a unique electrosurgical snare electrode (ESE) in combination with an ERBE electrosurgical generator and compared its effectiveness with that of two ultrasonic dissectors (Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator [CUSA] and harmonic scalpel [HS]) in performing LPN. Twelve female minipigs underwent right lower-pole LPN using one of the aforementioned modalities. Six weeks later, in the same animals, a left lower-pole LPN was performed using the same device, thereby providing an acute and chronic renal remnant to examine. The animals were harvested, and transverse and perpendicular histologic sections were prepared of the cut surface of each specimen. The weights of the LPN specimens and the remaining kidney were also recorded. The time required for partial nephrectomy, degree of hemostasis (i.e., blood loss), ease of excising the targeted tissue, changes in renal function, tissue reactivity, and depth of damage to the surface of the remaining renal parenchyma were measured for each device. All 12 procedures were successful using the ultrasonic dissection, and 11 procedures were successful using the ESE. The ESE was significantly faster than the two forms of ultrasonic dissection (p < 0.0001) and produced less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.002). Both forms of ultrasonic energy produced significantly deeper parenchymal injury in the acute surgical specimen (P = 0.03) and more parenchymal fibrosis and chronic inflammation in the chronic surgical specimens (P = 0.007) than the ESE. None of the animals exhibited any extravasation from the incised collecting system when studied by retrograde pyelography 6 weeks postoperatively at the time of left LPN and harvest. The function of the renal remnant was consistent with the size of the partial nephrectomy specimen. No hypertension developed in any of the study animals. Our results using a unique electrosurgical snare probe show it to have potential advantages as a rapid, hemostatic method for performing a partial nephrectomy. We believe that this instrument may represent an important tool for performing nephron-sparing surgery via an open or laparoscopic approach. Clinical trials are in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048292     DOI: 10.1089/end.1997.11.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy-the new standard?

Authors:  Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  Retroperitoneal and laparoscopic heminephrectomy in duplex kidney in infants and children.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Maria Escolino; Marco Castagnetti; Antonio Savanelli; Angela La Manna; Alessandra Farina; Francesco Turrà; Agnese Roberti; Alessandro Settimi; Francois Varlet; Holger Till; Jean Stephan Valla
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

3.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in duplex kidneys in infants and children: results of an European multicentric survey.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Francois Varlet; Dariusz Patkowski; Marco Castagnetti; Maria Escolino; Isabela Magdalena Draghici; Alessandro Settimi; Antonio Savanelli; Holger Till
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Maria Escolino; Go Miyano; Paolo Caione; Fabio Chiarenza; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Antonio Savanelli; Alessandro Settimi; Francois Varlet; Dariusz Patkowski; Mariapina Cerulo; Marco Castagnetti; Holger Till; Rosaria Marotta; Angela La Manna; Jean-Stephane Valla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique, oncologic efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  William K Johnston; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technical considerations and an update.

Authors:  Jose L Dominguez-Escrig; Nikhil Vasdev; Anna O'Riordon; Naeem Soomro
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Role of open nephron sparing surgery in the era of minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Gaurav Gupta; Sameer Grover; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Michael W Phelan; Kent T Perry; John Gore; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Transureteral saline perfusion to obtain renal hypothermia: potential application in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Donald S Crain; Craig R Spencer; Michael A Favata; Christopher L Amling
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors-comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping.

Authors:  Imran Khan Jalbani; Syed Muhammad Nazim; Maria Ahmed; Farhat Abbas
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.