Literature DB >> 9046396

Different approaches to anchorage: a survey and an evaluation.

B Melsen1, C Bosch.   

Abstract

Orthodontic treatment outcome is often compromised by the loss of anchorage. The forces acting on the anchorage unit have, however received surprisingly little attention, and the loss of anchorage is most frequently expressed in the sagittal occlusal relationship. The present paper discusses the interaction between vertical and sagittal components of dentofacial development, and the importance of taking vertical forces into consideration is stressed. The biological background for anchorage is reviewed, i.e., the impact on the cellular reaction of the periodontal ligament around the teeth of the anchorage unit from the orthodontic force system and from occlusion. A new rigid appliance consisting of two occlusal splints connected with transpalatal arches is introduced. The advantage of using the patient's sense of occlusion as part of anchorage by means of this appliance is demonstrated in a number of case presentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9046396     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0023:DATAAS>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  S S Chopra; Manish Mukherjee; Rajat Mitra; Gagan Deep Kochar; Abhijeet Kadu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-03-02

2.  Multipurpose use of orthodontic mini-implants to achieve different treatment goals.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Which anchorage device is the best during retraction of anterior teeth? An overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Sarah A Nabbat; Grant T McIntyre; David R Bearn
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.361

4.  Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction.

Authors:  Cristiane Aparecida de Assis Claro; Rosana Villela Chagas; Ana Christina Elias Claro Neves; Laís Regiane da Silva-Concílio
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

5.  Correction of Class II malocclusion and soft tissue profile in an adult patient.

Authors:  Aditi Gaur; Sandhya Maheshwari; Sanjeev Kumar Verma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in canine retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haonan Tian; Congman Xie; Min Lin; Hongmei Yang; Aishu Ren
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Mehrdad Shomali
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Yunhe Zhao; Houxuan Li; Huang Li; Lang Lei
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.