Literature DB >> 9044493

Intubation with laryngoscope versus transillumination performed by paramedic students on manikins and cadavers.

L Wik1, A C Naess, P A Steen.   

Abstract

Seventeen paramedic students, all of whom are novice intubators, performed laryngoscopic and Trachlight intubation after supervised training for 90 min on two manikins (Laerdal, AMBU) and 30 min on cadavers. A maximum of two intubation attempts lasting a maximum 30 s each were permitted on each manikin and the cadaver. The time for confirming tube placement by auscultation and securing the tube was added. Laryngoscopic intubation was successful on cadavers and both manikins in 94-100% of the trials. Intubation with the Trachlight was 100% successful in the Laerdal manikin, but significantly lower than with the laryngoscope in the AMBU manikin (65%), and in cadavers (50%). The mean intubation time was significantly longer (30-44 s) with the Trachlight compared with laryngoscopic intubation (10-23 s) in both manikins and cadavers. The present results do not indicate that intubation with the Trachlight is an improvement upon laryngoscopic intubation for novices.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9044493     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01027-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  3 in total

1.  Tracheal intubation by novice staff: the direct vision laryngoscope or the lighted stylet (Trachlight)?

Authors:  C R Soh; C F Kong; C S Kong; P C Ip-Yam; E Chin; M H Goh
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial.

Authors:  Zenon Truszewski; Paweł Krajewski; Marcin Fudalej; Jacek Smereka; Michael Frass; Oliver Robak; Bianka Nguyen; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Enhancing paramedics procedural skills using a cadaveric model.

Authors:  David Lim; Stephen Bartlett; Peter Horrocks; Courtenay Grant-Wakefield; Jodie Kelly; Vivienne Tippett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.