Literature DB >> 9044012

Hope in nursing research: a meta-analysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of research on hope.

J Kylmä1, K Vehviläinen-Julkunen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the ontological basis of hope and the epistemological solutions adopted in research on hope by reviewing research articles concerned with the subject in the field of nursing science. The material consisted of 46 articles published between 1975 and 1993, and the examination was based on the meta-analysis method. References to the ontology of hope were inductively clustered according to the principle of continuous comparison. For the analysis of epistemological solutions, the purpose of the study, population/respondents, and methods of data collection and analysis were identified. The articles reviewed focus on the essence and distinctive characteristics of hope. Although rich in detail and quite vivid, there is a certain lack of precision about the descriptions. Hope may be described as an emotion, an experience or need. A distinction is made between generalized and particularized hope. There is a clear emphasis on the necessity and the dynamism of hope. As far as its dynamics are concerned, the most important dimension is the dialectic between hope and despair. An affective, functional, contextual and temporal as well as relational dimension are distinguished in the process of hope. Research on hope consists in the main part of descriptive cross-sectional research that focuses on individuals who are unwell. The most common method of data collection is the questionnaire, while the analyses are typically based on quantitative methods. There is need for further work to clarify the concept of hope. In the field of nursing research, there is obvious need to carry out more qualitative longitudinal research. More attention should be paid to healthy individuals and families at different stages of their life cycle.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9044012     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025364.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  9 in total

Review 1.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Relationship between caregiver hopefulness and satisfaction with their children's mental health services.

Authors:  Sharon E Riley; Arnold J Stromberg; James J Clark
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-03-19

3.  Hope against hope in cancer at the end of life.

Authors:  Natalie A Pattison; Christopher Lee
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2009-06-16

4.  Patients' Hopes for Advanced Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Jeremy DeMartini; Joshua J Fenton; Ronald Epstein; Paul Duberstein; Camille Cipri; Daniel Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Paul Kaesberg; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Associations among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping in patients with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul R Helft; Fay Hlubocky; Ming Wen; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-07-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Coping, quality of life, and hope in adults with primary antibody deficiencies.

Authors:  Hanne Marie Høybråten Sigstad; Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen; Stig S Frøland
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Biopsychosocial correlates of hope in Asian patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rathi Mahendran; Shi Min Chua; Haikel A Lim; Isaac J Yee; Joyce Y S Tan; Ee Heok Kua; Konstadina Griva
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Association of trait and specific hopes: cross sectional study on students and workers of health professions in Split, Croatia.

Authors:  Mario Malički; Domagoj Marković; Matko Marušić
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications.

Authors:  Mario Malički; Ana Utrobičić; Ana Marušić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.