Literature DB >> 9043838

The effect of simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease. The Multicenter coronary Intervention Study (CIS).

H P Bestehorn1, U F Rensing, H Roskamm, P Betz, L Benesch, K Schemeitat, G Blümchen, J Claus, P Mathes, L Kappenberger, H Wieland, A Neiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In several angiographic trials, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have shown a beneficial effect on the progression of coronary artery disease. Using 20 mg simvastatin, day-1, a treatment period of up to 4 years was necessary to show a significant reduction in coronary artery disease progression. The question remains however whether higher dosages of simvastatin would be more advantageous in respect to the magnitude of the effect and the required time interval to demonstrate treatment efficacy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the Coronary Intervention Study (CIS), a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, the effects of lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease in 254 men with documented coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolaemia were investigated. Following a period of lipid-lowering diet, treatment with 40 mg simvastatin or placebo was maintained for an average of 2.3 years. Two primary angiographic endpoints were chosen: the global change score (visual evaluation according to the method of Blankenhorn) and the per patient mean change of minimum lumen diameter (evaluated by the CAAS I system). The mean simvastatin dose was 34.5 mg day-1. In the placebo group, the serum lipids remained unchanged; in comparison to the placebo group the simvastatin group showed a 35% LDL-cholesterol decrease. Coronary angiography was repeated in 205 patients (81%) and 203 film pairs (80%,) were evaluable by quantitative coronary angiography. In the simvastatin and placebo groups, the mean global change scores were +0.20 and +0.58 respectively, demonstrating a significantly slower progression of coronary artery disease in the treatment group (P = 0.02). The change in minimum lumen diameter assessed by computer-assisted quantitative evaluation with the CAAS I system was -0.02 mm in the simvastatin group and -0.10 mm in the placebo group (P = 0.002). In the simvastatin group, there was a significant correlation between the LDL cholesterol levels achieved therapeutically and the per patient mean loss of minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.29; P = 0.003). During the study period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of serious cardiac events (15 of 129 patients in the simvastatin group and 19 of 125 patients in the placebo group, ns).
CONCLUSION: Treatment with 40 mg simvastatin day-1 reduces serum cholesterol and slows the progression of coronary artery disease significantly within a short period of treatment time. In the treatment group, retardation of progression is inversely correlated to the LDL-cholesterol levels achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043838     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  13 in total

1.  Statins and total (not LDL) cholesterol concentration and outcome of myocardial infarction: results from a meta-analysis and an observational study.

Authors:  Xia Sheng; Li Wei; Michael J Murphy; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Statin treatment and progression of atherosclerotic plaque burden.

Authors:  Diederick E Grobbee; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  [Therapy with CSE inhibitors--more than lipid lowering?].

Authors:  A Weizel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Interaction between simvastatin and metoprolol with respect to cardiac beta-adrenoceptor density, catecholamine levels and perioperative catecholamine requirements in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  A Franka Nette; Getu Abraham; Fritz Rupert Ungemach; Reinhard Oertel; Wilhelm Kirch; Kirsten Leineweber; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Stefan Dhein
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  The complex interplay between cholesterol and prostate malignancy.

Authors:  Keith R Solomon; Michael R Freeman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Statin wars following coronary revascularization--evidence-based clinical practice?

Authors:  James M Brophy; Vania Costa
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Ultrasound diagnosis of bilateral quadriceps tendon rupture after statin use.

Authors:  Ryan D Nesselroade; Leslie Connor Nickels
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09

Review 8.  Statins in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pim van der Harst; Adriaan A Voors; Wiek H van Gilst; Michael Böhm; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Cardiac rehabilitation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Scott A Lear; Andrew Ignaszewski
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001

10.  All cholesterol-lowering interventions are expected to reduce stroke: Confirmatory data from IMPROVE-IT.

Authors:  Raffaele De Caterina; Tanya Salvatore; Roberto Marchioli
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.