Literature DB >> 9043677

Computational parallels between the biological olfactory pathway and its analogue 'the electronic nose': Part II. Sensor-based machine olfaction.

T C Pearce1.   

Abstract

Over the last fifteen years, we have witnessed a rapid expansion in the development of artificial odour sensing systems, or so called 'electronic nose' systems. Whilst the power of this approach to flavour has undoubtedly been demonstrated by its recent application to various complex odours, it will be argued that the original research programme, aimed at developing a comparative model of the biological olfactory pathway, has degenerated into an attempt to obtain an ad hoc workable system, based around readily available sensor and pattern recognition (PARC) technologies. At the time, the first 'model' nose system reflected the limited understanding of sensory information processing carried out within the biological olfactory pathway. We are now presented with an opportunity to evaluate and re-assess the architecture for an electronic nose, in view of the recent advances in understanding the key processing principals exploited by the olfactory bulb and cortex in the identification and characterisation of molecular stimuli. In Part II of this paper, we examine the parallels that exist between the biological olfactory system and the electronic nose. It is shown that the two systems share many similarities in their architectures and other properties, such as odour delivery, nonspecific sensor/receptor response, sensor/receptor preprocessing and content addressable memory (CAM) function. Of particular importance, both systems need to overcome similar operating problems, such as sensor/receptor drift, degeneration and poisoning, limited sensor/receptor sensitivity, discrimination of odour quality invariant of intensity and also the identification of particular odour components within a mixture of background odours. Finally, a number of opportunities for improving the biological plausibility of electronic nose systems are suggested that may yield an improvement in performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043677     DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2647(96)01660-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  16 in total

1.  Prospects for clinical application of electronic-nose technology to early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in culture and sputum.

Authors:  Reinhard Fend; Arend H J Kolk; Conrad Bessant; Patricia Buijtels; Paul R Klatser; Anthony C Woodman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A low-cost, MR-compatible olfactometer.

Authors:  Steven B Lowen; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-05

3.  Use of an electronic nose to diagnose Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers and cattle.

Authors:  R Fend; R Geddes; S Lesellier; H-M Vordermeier; L A L Corner; E Gormley; E Costello; R G Hewinson; D J Marlin; A C Woodman; M A Chambers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Both gas chromatography and an electronic nose reflect chemical polymorphism of juniper shrubs browsed or avoided by sheep.

Authors:  Gábor Markó; Ildikó Novák; Jeno Bernáth; Vilmos Altbäcker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Mimicking biological design and computing principles in artificial olfaction.

Authors:  Baranidharan Raman; Mark Stopfer; Steve Semancik
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 6.  Clinical application of volatile organic compound analysis for detecting infectious diseases.

Authors:  Shneh Sethi; Ranjan Nanda; Trinad Chakraborty
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Odour detection methods: olfactometry and chemical sensors.

Authors:  Magda Brattoli; Gianluigi de Gennaro; Valentina de Pinto; Annamaria Demarinis Loiotile; Sara Lovascio; Michele Penza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Analytical methods for chemical and sensory characterization of scent-markings in large wild mammals: a review.

Authors:  Simone B Soso; Jacek A Koziel; Anna Johnson; Young Jin Lee; W Sue Fairbanks
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Gas sensors characterization and multilayer perceptron (MLP) hardware implementation for gas identification using a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA).

Authors:  Fayçal Benrekia; Mokhtar Attari; Mounir Bouhedda
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Odor sampling: techniques and strategies for the estimation of odor emission rates from different source types.

Authors:  Laura Capelli; Selena Sironi; Renato Del Rosso
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.