Literature DB >> 9043455

A randomized comparison of physical performance following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. The Coala Trial Group.

M S Liem1, Y van der Graaf, R C Zwart, I Geurts, T J van Vroonhoven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Return to normal activity after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been reported to occur sooner than after conventional repair.
METHODS: As part of a randomized study, the ability of patients to return to normal activity was assessed by measuring abdominal muscular performance with an exercise test. In addition, patients completed a questionnaire concerning activities of daily life (ADL) and were asked when they returned to normal activities. All patients were given similar instructions for resumption of activities.
RESULTS: Patients who had a laparoscopic repair returned to normal activities sooner (6 versus 10 days; P = 0.0003). One week after operation, these patients were able to perform more repetitions of both exercise (14 versus two straight leg raises; 16 versus seven curled sit ups; both P < 0.0001) and their ADL scores were significantly better (89 versus 72; P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hernia repair results in a quicker recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  15 in total

1.  Conventional or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? The surgeon's choice.

Authors:  N Williams; A Scott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Day case laparoscopic herniorraphy. A NICE procedure with a long learning curve.

Authors:  M Lim; C J O'Boyle; C M S Royston; P C Sedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review.

Authors:  E Kuhry; R N van Veen; H R Langeveld; E W Steyerberg; J Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cost-effective laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair: the Portsmouth technique.

Authors:  S Basu; S Chandran; S S Somers; S K C Toh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R Bittner; S Sauerland; C-G Schmedt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost-effective, reliable laparoscopic hernia repair: a report on 500 consecutive repairs.

Authors:  F J Fazzio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Quality of life and visceral surgery].

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; C Baltin; F Berlth; S P Mönig; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Preperitoneal mesh repair of spigelian hernias under local anesthesia: description and clinical evaluation of a new technique.

Authors:  Z Malazgirt; A Dervisoğlu; C Polat; E Guneren; H Guven; T Akpolat
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an anatomically contoured three-dimensional mesh.

Authors:  R C W Bell; J G Price
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.