H Sugerman1, A Windsor, M Bessos, L Wolfe. 1. Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine relationship of intra-abdominal pressure to central obesity and the comorbidity of obesity. DESIGN: Non-randomized, prospective. SETTING: University hospital, operating room. SUBJECTS: Eighty-four anaesthetized consecutive patients prior to gastric bypass for morbid obesity and five non-obese patients before colectomy for ulcerative colitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight, body mass index (BMI), co-morbid history, sagittal abdominal diameter, waist:hip (W:H) ratio and urinary bladder pressure, as an estimate of intra-abdominal pressure. RESULTS: Urinary bladder pressure was greater in the obese than the non-obese (18 +/- 0.7 vs. 7 +/- 1.6 cm H2O, P < 0.001), correlated with sagittal abdominal diameter (r = +0.67, P < 0.001) and was greater (P < 0.05) in patients with, than those without, morbidity probably (hypoventilation, gastroesophageal reflux, venous stasis, stress incontinence, incisional hernia) or possibly (hypertension, diabetes) due to increased abdominal pressure. W:H ratio correlated with urinary bladder pressure in men (r = +0.6, P < 0.05) but not women (r = -0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Increased sagittal abdominal diameter was associated with increased intraabdominal pressure which contributed to obesity-related comorbidity. W:H ratio was not a reliable indicator of intra-abdominal pressure for women who often have both peripheral and central obesity. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and Type II diabetes and hypertension.
OBJECTIVES: To determine relationship of intra-abdominal pressure to central obesity and the comorbidity of obesity. DESIGN: Non-randomized, prospective. SETTING: University hospital, operating room. SUBJECTS: Eighty-four anaesthetized consecutive patients prior to gastric bypass for morbid obesity and five non-obesepatients before colectomy for ulcerative colitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight, body mass index (BMI), co-morbid history, sagittal abdominal diameter, waist:hip (W:H) ratio and urinary bladder pressure, as an estimate of intra-abdominal pressure. RESULTS: Urinary bladder pressure was greater in the obese than the non-obese (18 +/- 0.7 vs. 7 +/- 1.6 cm H2O, P < 0.001), correlated with sagittal abdominal diameter (r = +0.67, P < 0.001) and was greater (P < 0.05) in patients with, than those without, morbidity probably (hypoventilation, gastroesophageal reflux, venous stasis, stress incontinence, incisional hernia) or possibly (hypertension, diabetes) due to increased abdominal pressure. W:H ratio correlated with urinary bladder pressure in men (r = +0.6, P < 0.05) but not women (r = -0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Increased sagittal abdominal diameter was associated with increased intraabdominal pressure which contributed to obesity-related comorbidity. W:H ratio was not a reliable indicator of intra-abdominal pressure for women who often have both peripheral and central obesity. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and Type II diabetes and hypertension.
Authors: Sanket Srinivasa; Laura S Hill; Tarik Sammour; Andrew G Hill; Richard Babor; Habib Rahman Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Michael B Cook; Sanford M Dawsey; Neal D Freedman; Peter D Inskip; Sara M Wichner; Sabah M Quraishi; Susan S Devesa; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 3.445