Literature DB >> 9040519

Knowledge and attitudes about depression among non-generalists and generalists.

W A Shao1, J W Williams, S Lee, R G Badgett, B Aaronson, J E Cornell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to learn more about barriers to managing depression by comparing knowledge and attitudes about depression among physicians, internists, obstetrician-gynecologists, and a reference group of psychiatrists. Among the non-psychiatrists, we hypothesized that generalist physicians would have more favorable attitudes and greater knowledge about depression than non-generalists.
METHODS: Survey questionnaires were sent to resident and faculty physicians (N = 375) of two university-affiliated medical centers. The physicians were classified as non-generalists (medicine subspecialists, transitional year interns, and obstetrician-gynecologists), generalists (general internists and family physicians), and psychiatrists. A 33-item written questionnaire assessed knowledge and three attitudinal dimensions: attitudes attributed by physicians to patients; physicians' confidence in managing depression; and physicians' psychosocial orientation. A knowledge scale and an attitudes scale were scored by adding the number of knowledge items answered correctly and the more favorable attitudinal responses. Multivariable regression was used to identify physician characteristics among non-generalists and generalists associated with higher knowledge and attitudinal scores.
RESULTS: Response rate was 82%. Sixty percent of the respondents were male, 63% were resident physicians, and 14% had advanced psychosocial training. Non-generalists and generalists had similar demographic characteristics, but psychiatrists were significantly more experienced. Psychiatrists had the most favorable attitudes, followed by generalists and non-generalists. Compared with non-generalists, generalists were more confident in prescribing antidepressants (62% vs 25%), more likely to report that treating depression is rewarding (71% vs 39%), and less likely to refer to a psychiatrist (58% vs 79%). Generalist classification, increased experience, and higher levels of psychosocial training were associated with more favorable attitudes. Knowledge scores were significantly higher for psychiatrists than for non-generalists and generalists. Among non-psychiatrists, correct responses for knowledge items were: treatment efficacy (61%), treatment duration (59%), > or = 5 DSM-III-R criteria (52%), and prevalence of depression (30%). Among those with incorrect responses, both non-generalists and generalists overestimated the prevalence (52%) and underestimated the efficacy of drug therapy (30%).
CONCLUSIONS: Generalists and non-generalists have similar and relatively good basic knowledge about depression. Misperceptions about treatment efficacy, and attitudinal barriers, particularly among non-generalists, may compromise the physician's ability to diagnose and manage depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9040519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  12 in total

1.  Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation in a vignette study of depression.

Authors:  H Tiemeier; W J de Vries; M van het Loo; J P Kahan; N Klazinga; R Grol; H Rigter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

2.  Primary care clinicians evaluate integrated and referral models of behavioral health care for older adults: results from a multisite effectiveness trial (PRISM-e).

Authors:  Joseph J Gallo; Cynthia Zubritsky; James Maxwell; Michael Nazar; Hillary R Bogner; Louise M Quijano; Heidi J Syropoulos; Karen L Cheal; Hongtu Chen; Herman Sanchez; John Dodson; Sue E Levkoff
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Treating depression in staff-model versus network-model managed care organizations.

Authors:  L S Meredith; L V Rubenstein; K Rost; D E Ford; N Gordon; P Nutting; P Camp; K B Wells
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Barriers to initiating depression treatment in primary care practice.

Authors:  Paul A Nutting; Kathryn Rost; Miriam Dickinson; James J Werner; Perry Dickinson; Jeffrey L Smith; Beth Gallovic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient characteristics associated with participation in a practice-based study of depression in late life: the Spectrum study.

Authors:  Joseph J Gallo; Hillary R Bogner; Joseph B Straton; Katherine Margo; Pat Lesho; Peter V Rabins; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.210

6.  A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  L Fisher; M M Skaff; J T Mullan; P Arean; R Glasgow; U Masharani
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Identifying depressed older adults in primary care: a secondary analysis of a multisite randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Corrine I Voils; Maren K Olsen; John W Williams
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

8.  Attitudes toward depression among Japanese non-psychiatric medical doctors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tsuyuka Ohtsuki; Manami Kodaka; Rumi Sakai; Fuminobu Ishikura; Yoichiro Watanabe; Anthony Mann; Mark Haddad; Mitsuhiko Yamada; Masatoshi Inagaki
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-08-16

9.  Designing an intervention to prevent suicide: PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial).

Authors:  M L Bruce; J L Pearson
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.986

10.  A preliminary study of aged care facility staff indicates limitations in awareness of the link between depression and physical morbidity.

Authors:  Joanna Atkins; Sharon L Naismith; Georgina M Luscombe; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.