Literature DB >> 9039590

Application of contrast agents in the evaluation of stroke: conventional MR and echo-planar MR imaging.

M Maeda1, J E Maley, D L Crosby, J P Quets, M W Zhu, G J Lee, G J Lawler, T Ueda, B H Bendixen, W T Yuh.   

Abstract

The availability of new therapeutic interventions, including neuroprotective agents and endovascular thrombolysis, has given new hope to patients suffering an acute stroke. Early intervention remains a key factor in the effectiveness of these new and traditional treatments. More importantly, the capability to assess the viability and reversibility of the ischemic tissue became essential for better delineation and differentiation of infarcted versus ischemic tissue and patient management. Abnormal MR imaging (MRI) findings during acute stroke usually reflect the underlying pathophysiologic changes, which can be classified into three sequential stages: (a) hypoperfusion, (b) cellular dysfunction and (c) breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. The first stage is a kinetic phenomenon (not biologic) and, therefore, can be detected immediately. Contrast agents accentuate the abnormal flow kinetics and facilitate the early diagnosis of ischemia using either conventional MRI or newly developed echo-planar perfusion imaging (EPPI). The demonstration of abnormal arterial or parenchymal enhancement on conventional MRI during acute stroke provides the earliest sign of vascular occlusion/stenosis. EPPI, in contrast, provides information related to microcirculation (< 100 microns) and tissue reserve (cerebral blood volume) that cannot be obtained by conventional angiography and is directly related to the target end-organ. Further information obtained from both contrast MRI and EPPI may have a predictive value in the clinical outcome of acute stroke patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9039590     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  The need for objective assessment of the new imaging techniques and understanding the expanding roles of stroke imaging.

Authors:  W T Yuh; T Ueda; M White; M E Schuster; T Taoka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Hemodynamic and permeability changes in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome measured by dynamic susceptibility perfusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Lauren M Brubaker; J Keith Smith; Yueh Z Lee; Weili Lin; Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Benefits of perfusion MR imaging relative to diffusion MR imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of hyperacute stroke.

Authors:  J L Sunshine; N Bambakidis; R W Tarr; C F Lanzieri; O O Zaidat; J I Suarez; D M Landis; W R Selman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of patients with subacute cerebral ischemia: comparison with conventional and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  M Augustin; R Bammer; J Simbrunner; R Stollberger; H P Hartung; F Fazekas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Abnormal hyperintensity within the subarachnoid space evaluated by fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging: a spectrum of central nervous system diseases.

Authors:  Masayuki Maeda; Akira Yagishita; Tatsuya Yamamoto; Hajime Sakuma; Kan Takeda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.