Literature DB >> 9039350

Infection after intramedullary nailing: an experimental investigation on rabbits.

G A Melcher1, C Hauke, A Metzdorf, S M Perren, G Printzen, U Schlegel, W J Ziegler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate three relevant aspects of intramedullary nailing in terms of their effect on the occurrence of local infection. In an infection model on the rabbit tibia, the following were compared: a hollow and a solid nail (Experiment I), a reamed with an unreamed technique (Experiment II), and a steel with a titanium nail (Experiment III). In order to minimize the number of animals required, a grouped sequential procedure combined with an "up and down" dosage technique was applied. Microbiological evaluation was both qualitative and quantitative. The results in Experiment 1 (n = 44) indicated an infection rate for the hollow nail (59%) almost double that of the solid nail (27%) (P < or = 0.05). Experiment II (n = 44) produced an infection rate of 50% for the unreamed technique compared to 64% for the reamed technique, a difference which, on the basis of the number of bacteria present, was also statistically significant (P < or = 0.05). In Experiment III (n = 44) an infection rate of 82% was recorded for the steel nail compared to 59% for the titanium nail (P < or = 0.05). The results of the three experiments are only partially comparable with each other because of the grouped sequential procedure and the different inocula used. Nonetheless it would seem that the dead space inherent in the design of the hollow nail represents a considerable risk with regard to the occurrence of local infection. Reaming the medullary cavity with the attendant reduction in local vascularity and necrosis and the lesser biocompatibility of steel compared to titanium may be additional risk factors which should not be overlooked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9039350     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89028-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

1.  Intramedullary nailing in open tibia fractures: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Bruce H Ziran; M Darowish; B A Klatt; J F Agudelo; W R Smith
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can Normal Fracture Healing Be Achieved When the Implant Is Retained on the Basis of Infection? An Experimental Animal Model.

Authors:  Fuat Bilgili; Halil Ibrahim Balci; Kayahan Karaytug; Kerim Sariyilmaz; Ata Can Atalar; Ergun Bozdag; Meral Tuna; Bilge Bilgic; Nezahat Gurler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Material and biofilm load of K wires in toe surgery: titanium versus stainless steel.

Authors:  Martin Clauss; Susanne Graf; Silke Gersbach; Beat Hintermann; Thomas Ilchmann; Markus Knupp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  rhBMP-2 modulation of gene expression in infected segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Katherine E Brick; Xinqian Chen; Jamie Lohr; Andrew H Schmidt; Louis S Kidder; William D Lew
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A case of chronic osteomyelitis after flexible intramedullary nailing of the femur in 14-year-old boy.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Roger Erivan; Damien Mondon; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-05-17

6.  Functional outcome of patients of tibial fracture treated with solid nail (SIGN nail) versus conventional hollow nail - A randomized trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Maharjan; Bikram Prasad Shrestha; Pashupati Chaudhary; Raju Rijal; Rosan Prasad Shah Kalawar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-01

7.  Complications during removal of stainless steel versus titanium nails used for intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia.

Authors:  Mustafa Seyhan; Olcay Guler; Mahir Mahirogullari; Ferdi Donmez; Arel Gereli; Serhat Mutlu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.