Literature DB >> 9038269

The effect of sartorius transposition on wound morbidity following inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy.

P J Paley1, P R Johnson, L L Adcock, J A Cosin, M D Chen, J M Fowler, L B Twiggs, L F Carson.   

Abstract

In spite of efforts to reduce complications associated with inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy (IFL), morbidity continues to be substantial. We sought to assess the efficacy of sartorius transposition (ST) in reducing groin wound complications following IFL, in patients with vulvar malignancy. The records of 101 patients with vulvar cancer undergoing IFL through separate incisions between March 1975 and December 1994 were examined. Sixty-two patients undergoing ST (group 1) were compared to 38 who did not (group 2). The groups were similar with respect to age, weight, tobacco/alcohol use, prior abdominal/vulvar surgery, prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, or peripheral vascular disease, and previous exposure to irradiation or chemotherapy. Additionally, there was no significant difference with respect to extent of disease, incidence of macro-/microscopic groin metastases, use of groin drains, and use of perioperative antibiotics or deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Groin wound complications were less frequent in patients undergoing ST (group 1). The incidence of groin cellulitis was 30% in group 1 compared with an incidence of 58% in group 2 (P = 0.011). Significant groin wound morbidity, defined as either wound breakdown or cellulitis, was seen less frequently in group 1 (41% vs 66%; P = 0.029). Employing a multivariate analysis, only patient weight < 150 lbs and performance of ST were established as independently associated with a reduction in groin morbidity following IFL (P = 0.0281 and P = 0.0075, respectively). In conclusion, despite waning enthusiasm for its performance, ST appeared to significantly reduce the incidence of wound morbidity after IFL. Our data confirmed that separate incisions, and improved perioperative antibiotics, have not eliminated the value inherent in this surgical modification. We suggest a prospective trial to further establish the benefit of sartorius transposition during IFL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9038269     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.4557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Risk evaluation in cutaneous melanoma patients undergoing lymph node dissection: impact of POSSUM.

Authors:  F Egberts; C Hartje; C Schafmayer; K C Kaehler; W von Schönfels; A Hauschild; T Becker; J H Egberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Surgical management of metastatic inguinal lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Marc C Swan; Dominic Furniss; Oliver C S Cassell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-27

Review 3.  Management of lymph nodes in the treatment of vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Saito; Keiji Kato
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  [Lymphadenectomy of the inguinal region and pelvis].

Authors:  P M Vogt; L-W Lahoda; M Meyer-Marcotty; M Spies; K H Busch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Vulvar carcinoma.

Authors:  R L Coleman; J T Santoso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-06

6.  Risk factors of synchronous inguinal lymph nodes metastasis for lower rectal cancer involving the anal canal.

Authors:  Renjie Wang; Peng Wu; Debing Shi; Hongtu Zheng; Liyong Huang; Weilie Gu; Ye Xu; Sanjun Cai; Guoxiang Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical application of sartorius tendon transposition during radical vulvectomy: a case control study of 58 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Lei Li; Xinxin Kou; Xiaojie Feng; Fenghua Liu; Hongtu Chao; Liying Wang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.