Literature DB >> 9037987

Analysis of methods for predicting near-magnification power.

J H Elam1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data were analyzed from 25 consecutive patient visits to the Low Vision Rehabilitation Service at Southern College of Optometry, during which magnification for near was recommended.
METHODS: Linear regressions with analysis of variances were calculated for the results obtained from four near-different near-magnification prediction-calculation methods to determine how accurately they predicted the final near recommended magnifications. A t-test was performed to look for mean differences between calculation methods.
RESULTS: No significance was found between the means of three of the calculation methods; a significant difference was found for one. However, all four near-magnification calculation methods significantly predicted final near magnification.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-vision rehabilitation clinicians may feel comfortable using any of the four near-magnification methods Choice of method may be a reflection of previous method usage by the clinician. Use of the Lighthouse Near Acuity Test Chart reduces the need to calculate the near-magnification power with which to begin near-magnification testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9037987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc        ISSN: 0003-0244


  2 in total

1.  In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE).

Authors:  Susan L Stark; Emily K Somerville; John C Morris
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Client-centred home modifications improve daily activity performance of older adults.

Authors:  Susan Stark; Amanda Landsbaum; Janice L Palmer; Emily K Somerville; John C Morris
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.