Literature DB >> 9037782

Key pecking during extinction after intermittent or continuous reinforcement as a function of the number of reinforcers delivered during training.

T J Zarcone1, M N Branch, C E Hughes, H S Pennypacker.   

Abstract

Key pecking by 7 pigeons was established and maintained on a multiple variable-ratio variable-ratio (VR) schedule of food presentation. The schedule in one of the components was then changed to fixed-ratio (FR) 1 for a predetermined number of reinforcers. Both components were then changed to extinction (i.e., multiple extinction, extinction). This sequence was repeated a different number of times for each pigeon to determine the relation between the number of reinforcers delivered during each component of the multiple VR FR 1 schedule and the number of responses during extinction. For most pigeons, there were fewer responses during extinction in the presence of a stimulus recently correlated with FR 1, regardless of the number of reinforcers received. The ratio of the total responses in extinction in the former VR component to the total responses in the former FR 1 component increased as the number of reinforcers delivered during each component of the multiple schedule increased. Within-subject replications of the partial-reinforcement extinction effect generally occurred, and there were no overall reductions in the number of responses in extinction with repeated exposures to extinction.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9037782      PMCID: PMC1284583          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Resistance-to-extinction functions in the single organism.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Repeated conditioning-extinction sessions as a function of the reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  D H BULLOCK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative resistance to extinction of aperiodic and continuous reinforcement separately and in combination.

Authors:  F A LIKELY
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1958-04

4.  Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength.

Authors:  M P WILSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

5.  Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?

Authors:  J A Nevin; L D Smith; J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The analysis of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin; C Mandell; J R Atak
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Extinction changes during a series of reinforcement-extinction sessions.

Authors:  D D WICKENS; R C MILES
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-08

8.  Partial reinforcement: a review and critique.

Authors:  W O JENKINS; J C STANLEY
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  A reversed partial-reinforcement effect.

Authors:  W B Pavlik; P L Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-10

10.  A reversed PRE.

Authors:  W B Pavlik; P L Carlton; R Lehr; C Hendrickson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Drug discrimination: stimulus control during repeated testing in extinction.

Authors:  T J Zarcone; N A Ator
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Resistance to extinction following variable-interval reinforcement: reinforcer rate and amount.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.