Literature DB >> 9037781

The discrimination of relative frequency by pigeons.

A Machado1, M Cevik.   

Abstract

Five experiments addressed the issue of how pigeons learn to discriminate the relative frequency of stimuli. During a sampling period, three different stimuli (keylights) were presented serially, in mixed order, and with different frequencies. During a choice period, the stimuli were presented simultaneously, and reinforcement was arranged for choosing the stimulus that was presented the least number of times during the sample. The results showed that (a) the overall proportion of correct choices was always above chance levels; (b) the likelihood of a correct choice decreased with the serial position of the correct stimulus, a negative recency effect; (c) when the last three stimuli of the sample were constrained to be one of each kind, the negative recency effect decreased but errors became more likely when the correct stimulus occurred early in the sample, a negative primacy effect; (d) accurate performance generalized to new and larger samples; and (e) under some conditions the probability of a correct choice was independent of the serial position of the correct stimulus. The serial position curves suggest that in a least frequent discrimination task, two processes determine how the least frequent stimulus controls behavior: a passive decay process (the stimulus loses its effectiveness with time since its last occurrence), and a residual salience process (when the stimulus occurs in the first position it may decay to a higher asymptote than when it occurs in later positions.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9037781      PMCID: PMC1284582          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: relative recency.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  How frequency affects recency judgments: a model for recency discrimination.

Authors:  A J Flexser; G H Bower
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-10

7.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02

9.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes.

Authors:  W H Meck; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-07

10.  Effects of deprivation upon counting and timing in rats.

Authors:  F MECHNER; L GUEVREKIAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events.

Authors:  R Keen; A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Writing and overwriting short-term memory.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.