Literature DB >> 9034970

The effectiveness of community water fluoridation in the United States.

H S Horowitz.   

Abstract

Grand Rapids, the first city in the world to implement controlled water fluoridation, has served as a model for thousands of other communities. Fluoridation is one of the greatest public health and disease-preventive measures of all time. Its advantages include effectiveness for all, ease of delivery, safety, equity, and low cost. Today, nearly 56 percent of the US population lives in fluoridated communities (62% of those on central water supplies). Previously observed caries reductions of one-half to two-thirds are no longer attainable in the United States because other fluoride methods and products have reduced the caries prevalence in all areas, thus diluting the measurement of effectiveness, and because benefits of fluoridation are dispersed in many ways to persons in nonfluoridated areas. Water fluoridation itself, however, remains as effective as it ever was among groups at high risk to dental caries. Contrary to early beliefs that stressed the importance of preeruptive fluoride exposure, fluoridation also provides an important source of topical fluoride and facilitates remineralization. Although data on effectiveness and safety are compelling, future progress of water fluoridation will be affected by economic, political, and public perception factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9034970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02448.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Dent        ISSN: 0022-4006            Impact factor:   1.821


  15 in total

1.  Fluoridation, fractures, and teeth.

Authors:  H W Hausen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

2.  The association between community water fluoridation and adult tooth loss.

Authors:  Matthew Neidell; Karin Herzog; Sherry Glied
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Fluoride content of solid foods impacts daily intake.

Authors:  Scott J Rankin; Steven M Levy; John J Warren; Julie Eichenberger Gilmore; Barbara Broffitt
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.821

4.  Community effectiveness of public water fluoridation in reducing children's dental disease.

Authors:  Jason Mathew Armfield
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Cutoff designs for community-based intervention studies.

Authors:  Michael L Pennell; Erinn M Hade; David M Murray; Dale A Rhoda
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  The prevalence of dental fluorosis in relation to water or salt fluoridation and reported use of fluoride toothpaste in school-age children.

Authors:  D Sagheri; J McLoughlin; J J Clarkson
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

7.  An oral health study of centenarians and children of centenarians.

Authors:  Laura B Kaufman; Tiffany K Setiono; Gheorghe Doros; Stacy Andersen; Rebecca A Silliman; Paula K Friedman; Thomas T Perls
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  Disparities in Access to Oral Health Care.

Authors:  Mary E Northridge; Anjali Kumar; Raghbir Kaur
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  The association between social deprivation and the prevalence and severity of dental caries and fluorosis in populations with and without water fluoridation.

Authors:  Michael G McGrady; Roger P Ellwood; Anne Maguire; Michaela Goodwin; Nicola Boothman; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Evaluating the use of fluorescent imaging for the quantification of dental fluorosis.

Authors:  Michael G McGrady; Roger P Ellwood; Andrew Taylor; Anne Maguire; Michaela Goodwin; Nicola Boothman; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.