Literature DB >> 9034606

Multiple drug resistance and intermediate filaments.

A E Cress1, W S Dalton.   

Abstract

One major obstacle to the successful treatment of epithelial derived tumors, such as breast and prostate carcinoma, is the presence of a multiple drug resistance phenotype. The drug resistance which is observed in growing epithelial derived cancer cells could either be an intrinsic, selected and/or an acquired characteristic. A survey of the survival data from several laboratories suggests that epithelial derived tumor cells, which have never been challenged with damaging agents, are in some cases 10 to 2,000 times more resistant to various chemotherapeutic agents as compared to hematopoietic cell lines. An intrinsic characteristic of epithelial cells is their resistance to the lethal effects of multiple types of damaging agents. A major feature of epithelial derived tumors is the expression of the intermediate filament type proteins known as cytokeratin. The simplest cytokeratin combination, cytokeratin 8 and 18, is a major cytoplasmic element within the cells of epithelial derived tumors. Earlier work showed that cytokeratin could be modified by mitoxantrone, a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of breast cancer. Increasing data indicates that the intrinsic drug resistance phenotype is due in part to the presence of continued expression of the cytokeratin 8 and 18. The cytokeratin dependent drug resistance (C-MDR) has been observed in two different cell types that were engineered to contain cytokeratin 8 and 18 expression. The cytokeratin monomers are known to self assemble into intermediate filament networks as shown by numerous basic studies. Experiments using transfected cell lines which are unable to assemble networks indicated that C-MDR does not depend upon the formation of an intermediate filament network. Selection of cytokeratin network defective tumor cells did not increase their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. These data are interesting since it suggests that the C-MDR phenotype is not dependent upon the structural nature (i.e. network forming ability) of the cytokeratin. Our current working hypothesis is that the interaction of the damaging agent with cytokeratin may initiate signaling response(s) for cell survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9034606     DOI: 10.1007/bf00054015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  26 in total

1.  Retrovirus-mediated transgenic keratin expression in cultured fibroblasts: specific domain functions in keratin stabilization and filament formation.

Authors:  X Lu; E B Lane
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The cellular and molecular biology of keratins: beginning a new era.

Authors:  P A Coulombe
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 8.382

3.  Mechanisms of treatment failure.

Authors:  M H Tattersall
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Keratinocytes: key immunocytes of the integument.

Authors:  B J Nickoloff; L A Turka
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Flow cytometric assays of anticancer drug resistance.

Authors:  D W Hedley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Remarkable conservation of structure among intermediate filament genes.

Authors:  D Marchuk; S McCrohon; E Fuchs
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Biologic and biochemical effects of mitoxantrone.

Authors:  F E Durr
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  In vitro antiproliferative effects of albumin-doxorubicin conjugates against Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral neuroectodermal tumor cells.

Authors:  F Gabor; K Wollmann; G Theyer; I Haberl; G Hamilton
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Isolation of Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants deficient in excision repair and mitomycin C bioactivation.

Authors:  A M Dulhanty; M Li; G F Whitmore
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  9-alkyl anthracyclines. Absence of cross-resistance to adriamycin in human and murine cell cultures.

Authors:  C A Scott; D Westmacott; M J Broadhurst; G J Thomas; M J Hall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Regulation of keratin and integrin gene expression in cancer and drug resistance.

Authors:  N Daly; P Meleady; D Walsh; M Clynes
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Cytokeratin 14 as a marker of squamous differentiation in transitional cell carcinomas.

Authors:  P Harnden; J Southgate
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Functional analysis of mouse keratin 8 in polyoma middle T-induced mammary gland tumours.

Authors:  H Baribault; M Wilson-Heiner; W Muller; J Penner; N Bakhiet
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  The Cohesive Metastasis Phenotype in Human Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  William L Harryman; James P Hinton; Cynthia P Rubenstein; Parminder Singh; Raymond B Nagle; Sarah J Parker; Beatrice S Knudsen; Anne E Cress
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-09-24

5.  Quantitative interactome analysis reveals a chemoresistant edgotype.

Authors:  Juan D Chavez; Devin K Schweppe; Jimmy K Eng; Chunxiang Zheng; Alex Taipale; Yiyi Zhang; Kohji Takara; James E Bruce
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.