OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of inspiratory nitric oxide concentration in a simple, constant flow delivery system during the use of two phasic-flow ventilatory modes. DESIGN: Laboratory study in a lung model. SETTING: University experimental laboratory. SUBJECT: Nitric oxide (800 ppm in nitrogen) was administered continuously into the inspiratory circuit to deliver a nitric oxide concentration of 10 and 40 ppm to a test lung during volume-controlled (constant flow) and pressure-controlled (decelerating flow) ventilation, with an FIO2 of 1.0. INTERVENTIONS: In each mode, minute ventilation of 7, 14, and 21 L/min and installation of mixing chambers (none, 1-L, 2-L, and 3.2-L turbulence boxes) were studied, respectively. Nitric oxide and nitric dioxide were monitored by chemiluminescence. Since the nitric oxide/nitrogen gas is the only nitrogen source in the system during ventilation with an FIO2 of 1.0, we evaluated the fluctuation in the inspiratory nitric oxide (NOx) concentration by measuring nitrogen with a fast-response analyzer. To test the effect of the measurement site, we measured nitric oxide concentrations using chemiluminescence at different positions in the inspiratory and expiratory limbs, with and without the mixing chambers, with a minute ventilation of 14 L/min and a nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nitrogen dioxide production was not influenced by the flow pattern. During a nitric oxide concentration of 10 ppm, nitrogen dioxide was always < 0.6 ppm. During a nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm, the highest nitrogen dioxide (4.47 ppm) concentration was found at the lowest minute ventilation and the largest inspiratory circuit volume. Nitric oxide values displayed by chemiluminescence indicated stable concentrations at all settings. However, without mixing chambers, NOx concentration calculated from nitrogen measurements demonstrated marked inspiratory fluctuations and was highest with a minute ventilation of 21 L/min and higher during pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation (nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm, pressure-controlled ventilation: 14.5 to 130.5 ppm; volume-controlled ventilation: 21.6 to 104.7 ppm; nitric oxide concentration of 10 ppm, pressure-controlled ventilation: 3.2 to 30.9 ppm; volume-controlled ventilation: 4.5 to 27.1 ppm). NOx concentration fluctuation decreased with an increasing mixing chamber, and was negligible at all settings with the 3.2-L turbulence box. Nitric oxide concentration fluctuation influenced chemiluminescence measurements. The displayed nitric oxide values varied, depending on the sampling site, and did not accurately reflect mean inspiratory nitric oxide concentration. Incorporation of a mixing chamber eradicated this sampling site influence. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous flow delivery of nitric oxide into the circuit of a phasic-flow ventilator results in marked inspiratory nitric oxide concentration fluctuation that is not detected by a slow-response chemiluminescence analyzer. Moreover, nitric oxide concentration fluctuation can influence the accuracy of the chemiluminescence measurements. These effects can be diminished by using additional mixing chambers to facilitate a stable gas concentration. As these mixing volumes increase the contact time of nitric oxide with oxygen, an increase of nitrogen dioxide has to be taken into account.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of inspiratory nitric oxide concentration in a simple, constant flow delivery system during the use of two phasic-flow ventilatory modes. DESIGN: Laboratory study in a lung model. SETTING: University experimental laboratory. SUBJECT: Nitric oxide (800 ppm in nitrogen) was administered continuously into the inspiratory circuit to deliver a nitric oxide concentration of 10 and 40 ppm to a test lung during volume-controlled (constant flow) and pressure-controlled (decelerating flow) ventilation, with an FIO2 of 1.0. INTERVENTIONS: In each mode, minute ventilation of 7, 14, and 21 L/min and installation of mixing chambers (none, 1-L, 2-L, and 3.2-L turbulence boxes) were studied, respectively. Nitric oxide and nitric dioxide were monitored by chemiluminescence. Since the nitric oxide/nitrogen gas is the only nitrogen source in the system during ventilation with an FIO2 of 1.0, we evaluated the fluctuation in the inspiratory nitric oxide (NOx) concentration by measuring nitrogen with a fast-response analyzer. To test the effect of the measurement site, we measured nitric oxide concentrations using chemiluminescence at different positions in the inspiratory and expiratory limbs, with and without the mixing chambers, with a minute ventilation of 14 L/min and a nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Nitrogen dioxide production was not influenced by the flow pattern. During a nitric oxide concentration of 10 ppm, nitrogen dioxide was always < 0.6 ppm. During a nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm, the highest nitrogen dioxide (4.47 ppm) concentration was found at the lowest minute ventilation and the largest inspiratory circuit volume. Nitric oxide values displayed by chemiluminescence indicated stable concentrations at all settings. However, without mixing chambers, NOx concentration calculated from nitrogen measurements demonstrated marked inspiratory fluctuations and was highest with a minute ventilation of 21 L/min and higher during pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation (nitric oxide concentration of 40 ppm, pressure-controlled ventilation: 14.5 to 130.5 ppm; volume-controlled ventilation: 21.6 to 104.7 ppm; nitric oxide concentration of 10 ppm, pressure-controlled ventilation: 3.2 to 30.9 ppm; volume-controlled ventilation: 4.5 to 27.1 ppm). NOx concentration fluctuation decreased with an increasing mixing chamber, and was negligible at all settings with the 3.2-L turbulence box. Nitric oxide concentration fluctuation influenced chemiluminescence measurements. The displayed nitric oxide values varied, depending on the sampling site, and did not accurately reflect mean inspiratory nitric oxide concentration. Incorporation of a mixing chamber eradicated this sampling site influence. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous flow delivery of nitric oxide into the circuit of a phasic-flow ventilator results in marked inspiratory nitric oxide concentration fluctuation that is not detected by a slow-response chemiluminescence analyzer. Moreover, nitric oxide concentration fluctuation can influence the accuracy of the chemiluminescence measurements. These effects can be diminished by using additional mixing chambers to facilitate a stable gas concentration. As these mixing volumes increase the contact time of nitric oxide with oxygen, an increase of nitrogen dioxide has to be taken into account.