L Gupta1, J E Ward, R S Hayward. 1. Central Sydney Area Health Service, Needs Assessment & Health Outcomes Unit, NSW.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views about and recall of clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire survey. SUBJECTS: Randomly selected Australian GPs. RESULTS: 286 of 373 GPs returned questionnaires (77% response rate). GPs' recall of each of nine guidelines ranged from 52% to 94%; 49% considered that their practice had changed as a result of a guideline. While 92% of respondents agreed that guidelines were "good educational tools", 85% indicated that guidelines were "developed by experts who don't understand general practice". Factors most frequently identified as important in deciding whether to follow the guideline recommendations were whether the guideline was based on evidence and credible endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Australian GPs have positive views about the purpose of clinical practice guidelines and an evidence-based approach to guidelines development. However, respondents rating of the perceived impact of available guidelines in everyday practice was low. The dissemination of specific guidelines is patchy and there is little evidence of systematic implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views about and recall of clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire survey. SUBJECTS: Randomly selected Australian GPs. RESULTS: 286 of 373 GPs returned questionnaires (77% response rate). GPs' recall of each of nine guidelines ranged from 52% to 94%; 49% considered that their practice had changed as a result of a guideline. While 92% of respondents agreed that guidelines were "good educational tools", 85% indicated that guidelines were "developed by experts who don't understand general practice". Factors most frequently identified as important in deciding whether to follow the guideline recommendations were whether the guideline was based on evidence and credible endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Australian GPs have positive views about the purpose of clinical practice guidelines and an evidence-based approach to guidelines development. However, respondents rating of the perceived impact of available guidelines in everyday practice was low. The dissemination of specific guidelines is patchy and there is little evidence of systematic implementation.