Literature DB >> 9033447

Protein characterization of fluorosed human enamel.

J T Wright1, S C Chen, K I Hall, M Yamauchi, J W Bawden.   

Abstract

Despite extensive investigation, the development mechanism or mechanisms resulting in dental fluorosis are unknown. Several hypotheses suggest abnormal matrix synthesis, secretion, and delayed and/or defective matrix degradation with retention of enamel protein. The purpose of this study was to characterize the protein composition of fluorosed human enamel. Nine permanent moderately fluorosed (developed in a 3.2 ppm H2O area) and ten permanent normal control teeth (from individuals with < 0.2 ppm F in their drinking water) were evaluated. The enamel fluoride concentration, protein content, and amino acid composition were determined for each tooth. The enamel proteins were further characterized by gel electrophoresis and by Western blot analysis by means of polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant amelogenin protein. Fluorotic enamel had significantly elevated (p = 0.0001) F levels compared with normal enamel (mean [F-] fluorosed = 431 ppm; mean [F-] control = 62 ppm). While there was a significantly greater protein content by weight in fluorosed enamel compared with normal enamel (mean fluorosed = 0.27%; mean control = 0.11%), the amino acid profiles were similar for fluorosed and normal enamel. Gel electrophoresis showed fluorosed enamel to have a greater diversity of primarily low-molecular-weight proteins compared with normal enamel. Western blot analysis did not indicate retention of amelogenin in either fluorosed or normal enamel. This investigation showed that the protein content of fluorosed enamel was greater than that of normal enamel; however, the amino acid compositions were similar for fluorosed and normal enamel. Furthermore, there does not appear to be retention of significant amounts of amelogenin in fully mature, moderately fluorosed human enamel. Although delayed removal of the enamel matrix proteins may play a role in the hypomineralization defects seen in fluorosed enamel, the majority of these proteins are absent in the mature tissue of these moderately fluorosed teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9033447     DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750120401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  18 in total

Review 1.  DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Lacruz; Stefan Habelitz; J Timothy Wright; Michael L Paine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Fluoride incorporation into apatite crystals delays amelogenin hydrolysis.

Authors:  Pamela K DenBesten; Li Zhu; Wu Li; Kotaro Tanimoto; Haichuan Liu; Halina E Witkowska
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.612

3.  Fluoride induces oxidative damage and SIRT1/autophagy through ROS-mediated JNK signaling.

Authors:  Maiko Suzuki; Cheryl Bandoski; John D Bartlett
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Fluoride does not inhibit enamel protease activity.

Authors:  C E Tye; J V Antone; J D Bartlett
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Associations between fluorosis of permanent incisors and fluoride intake from infant formula, other dietary sources and dentifrice during early childhood.

Authors:  Steven M Levy; Barbara Broffitt; Teresa A Marshall; Julie M Eichenberger-Gilmore; John J Warren
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Assessing Fluorosis Incidence in Areas with Low Fluoride Content in the Drinking Water, Fluorotic Enamel Architecture, and Composition Alterations.

Authors:  Izabela Strużycka; Aneta Olszewska; Agnieszka Bogusławska-Kapała; Szymon Hryhorowicz; Marta Kaczmarek-Ryś; Beniamin Oskar Grabarek; Rafał Staszkiewicz; Izabela Kuciel-Polczak; Agata Czajka-Jakubowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Appropriate real-time PCR reference genes for fluoride treatment studies performed in vitro or in vivo.

Authors:  D Faibish; M Suzuki; J D Bartlett
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  The acid test of fluoride: how pH modulates toxicity.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Sharma; Masahiro Tsuchiya; Ziedonis Skobe; Bakhos A Tannous; John D Bartlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sirtuin1 and autophagy protect cells from fluoride-induced cell stress.

Authors:  Maiko Suzuki; John D Bartlett
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Stress response pathways in ameloblasts: implications for amelogenesis and dental fluorosis.

Authors:  Megan L Sierant; John D Bartlett
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.