Literature DB >> 9033415

Enforcement of codes governing pharmaceutical promotion: what happens when companies breach advertising guidelines?

J Lexchin1.   

Abstract

Some or all of the promotional activities of pharmaceutical companies are typically governed through self-regulatory codes administered by industry associations. However, the conflicts between the commercial objectives and the ethical and scientific goals of promotion can potentially lead to serious weaknesses in the way in which these codes are enforced. This paper focuses on 5 critical aspects involved in the enforcement of codes governing pharmaceutical promotion: mechanisms for recognizing violations, composition of monitoring committees, sanctions for code violations, the quantity and quality of information in reports issued about complaints and code violations, and the circulation these reports receive. The Code of Marketing Practices of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada (PMAC) has serious weaknesses in all of these areas. Although the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board's Code of Advertising Acceptance avoids many of the deficiencies of the PMAC code, it, too, has weaknesses. Proposals for strengthening the enforcement of both codes are offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9033415      PMCID: PMC1226955     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical policies in Canada. Issues and challenges.

Authors:  D E Angus; H M Karpetz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Bioethics for clinicians: 17. Conflict of interest in research, education and patient care.

Authors:  T Lemmens; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Evaluation of rationality of promotional drug literature using World Health Organization guidelines.

Authors:  Smita N Mali; Sujata Dudhgaonkar; N P Bachewar
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.200

4.  Medicines information in medical journal advertising in Australia, Malaysia and the United States: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Noordin Othman; Agnes Isabelle Vitry; Elizabeth Ellen Roughead
Journal:  South Med Rev       Date:  2010-02-15

5.  Misleading advertising for antidepressants in Sweden: a failure of pharmaceutical industry self-regulation.

Authors:  Anna V Zetterqvist; Shai Mulinari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complaints, complainants, and rulings regarding drug promotion in the United Kingdom and Sweden 2004-2012: a quantitative and qualitative study of pharmaceutical industry self-regulation.

Authors:  Anna V Zetterqvist; Juan Merlo; Shai Mulinari
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  An evaluation of drug promotional literatures published in scientific medical journals.

Authors:  Pooja M Vachhani; Manish N Solanki; Mira K Desai
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  A study of perceptions and exposure of drug promotional literature among clinicians in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Sushil Sharma; Neha Akhoon; Htet Wai Moe; Deepak R Nair; Venkat Shashidhar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2020-05-07

9.  Pharmaceutical Industry Off-label Promotion and Self-regulation: A Document Analysis of Off-label Promotion Rulings by the United Kingdom Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority 2003-2012.

Authors:  Andreas Vilhelmsson; Courtney Davis; Shai Mulinari
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.