Literature DB >> 9030799

Mechanical valve in aortic position is a valid option in children and adolescents.

G Champsaur1, J Robin, F Tronc, A Curtil, J Ninet, F Sassolas, C Vedrinne, A Bozio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The choice of a valve substitute remains a challenge in young patients, with numerous reports of early degeneration and calcification of biological valves in this age group. Therefore an assessment of the long-term results after mechanical aortic valve replacement in children was initiated.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 54 consecutive patients aged 1.1 to 17 years (mean 12.8 +/- 4 years) operated on between 1975 and 1993. Aetiology was congenital in 34 patients, rheumatic in 13, infectious in 5, and dystrophic in 2. Concomitant surgery included mitral valve replacement (10), aortic annulus enlargement (9), correction of truncus arteriosus (7), Bentall operation (2), coarctation repair (2), tricuspid valvuloplasty (2), correction of double outlet right ventricle (1), and replacement of a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit (1). A Bjork-Shiley valve was implanted in 14 patients, and a St Jude Medical valve in 40. All patients were given Warfarin with a monthly INR control. Follow-up was completed through questionnaires mailed to referring physicians and direct clinical examination.
RESULTS: Overall early mortality was 13% (7 cases), and 6% (2 cases) in the 32 patients operated on after 1984. Follow-up was complete in 45 survivors (2 lost to follow-up), with a total follow-up of 261 patient-years. There were 6 late deaths, 4 being cardiac and due to persistent LV dysfunction, and 2 valve-related, due respectively to major gastro-intestinal bleeding and massive thromboembolism. Linearized rates of valve thrombosis and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage were both 0.3% per patient-year. Actuarial survival rate was respectively 84.5% at 5 years and 70.2% at 10 years. Reoperation was necessary in 3 patients for recurrent LV outflow tract obstruction. One patient with severe LV dysfunction is awaiting a heart transplant.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the longterm outcome after mechanical aortic valve replacement in children and adolescents is satisfactory and comparable to currently available reports on biological substitutes. The mandatory anticoagulant therapy is well tolerated in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9030799     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01029-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul Monagle; Anthony K C Chan; Neil A Goldenberg; Rebecca N Ichord; Janna M Journeycake; Ulrike Nowak-Göttl; Sara K Vesely
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Systemic mechanical heart valve replacement in children under 16 years of age.

Authors:  A R Tiete; J S Sachweh; J Groetzner; H Gulbins; E G Muehler; B J Messmer; S H Daebritz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Aortic valve replacement in children: Options and outcomes.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-11-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.