Mitochondrial and nuclear genes present conflicting portraits of human origins.

Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences reveal an abundance of polymorphic sites in which the frequencies of the segregating bases are very different. A typical polymorphism involves one base at low frequency and the other base at high frequency. In contrast, nuclear gene data sets tend to show an excess of polymorphisms in which both segregating bases are at intermediate frequencies. A new statistical test of this difference finds significant differences between mtDNA and nuclear gene data sets reported in the literature. However, differences in the polymorphism patterns could be caused by different sample origins for the different data sets. To examine the mtDNA-nuclear difference more closely, DNA sequences were generated from a portion of the X-linked pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha subunit (PDHA1) locus and from a portion of mitochondrial control region I (CRI) from each of eight individuals, four from sub-Saharan Africa. The two genes revealed a significant difference in the site frequency distribution of polymorphic sites. PDHA1 revealed an excess of intermediate-frequency polymorphisms, while CRI showed an excess of sites with the low-high frequency pattern. The discrepancy suggests that mitochondrial variation has been shaped by natural selection, and may not be ideal for some questions on human origins.