Literature DB >> 9028540

The response in spinal bone mass to tibolone treatment is related to bone turnover in elderly women.

N H Bjarnason1, K Bjarnason, C Hassager, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

To determine the ability of bone turnover to predict the response in bone mass during treatment with Tibolone, two biochemical markers of bone metabolism were evaluated [CrossLaps corrected for urinary creatinine (CrossLaps/Cr.) and serum osteocalcin measured in a newly developed assay (N-Mid)]. Data from a 2-year double-blind, randomized trial with 56 completing Tibolone-treated women and 13 placebo-treated women were studied. Bone mineral density in the spine (QDR-1000) and indices of bone turnover were determined every 3 months throughout the study. The response in bone mass was calculated as the percent annual change in bone mineral density from baseline and was determined from a total of nine measurements. The response in bone mass was correlated to prestudy values of CrossLaps/Cr. (r = 0.27; p < 0.05), but was uncorrelated to prestudy values of N-Mid. The changes from baseline of these two markers were significantly correlated with the response in bone mass from the 6 months' time point and throughout the rest of the study, i.e., at 1 year: CrossLaps/Cr.: r = 0.54; p < 0.001, N-Mid: r = 0.49; p < 0.001). The change from baseline in the two markers was clearly more predictive of the response in bone mass than the baseline values of these markers as evaluated in a multiple, linear regression-model. Within 1 year of Tibolone-treatment, measured changes in CrossLaps/Cr. and bone mineral density are at least equally predictive of the true response in bone mass over 2 years. These results indicate a possibility of monitoring Tibolone therapy with biochemical markers of bone turnover, at least on group basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028540     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00335-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  3 in total

Review 1.  Should the treatment of osteoporosis be more selective?

Authors:  B E Christopher Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Clinical utility of bone markers in the evaluation and follow-up of osteoporotic patients: why are the markers poorly accepted by clinicians?

Authors:  J J Stepan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Effects of tibolone and raloxifene on bone mineral density in osteopenic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  P D Delmas; S R Davis; J Hensen; S Adami; S van Os; E A Nijland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.