Literature DB >> 9027607

Identification of a chemoprevention cohort from a population of women at high risk for breast cancer.

C J Fabian1, S Kamel, C Zalles, B F Kimler.   

Abstract

In a prospective pilot study, we performed breast fine needle aspirations (FNAs) on 213 high-risk and 30 low-risk women and analyzed these aspirates for cytologic changes and biomarker abnormalities of aneuploidy and overexpressed estrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53 and HER-2/neu. High-risk women were those with a first degree relative with breast cancer (73%), prior biopsy indicating premalignant breast disease (26%), a history of breast cancer (13%), or some multiple of these risk factors (11%). Median ages of the high-risk and low-risk groups were 44 and 42, respectively. Sixty-three percent of the high-risk and 73% of the low-risk group were premenopausal. Sixty-eight percent of the high-risk and 17% of low-risk women had cytologic evidence of hyperplasia with or without atypia (P < .0001). Aneuploidy and overexpression of EGFR and p53 occurred in 25%, 36%, and 28% of high-risk subjects but in less than 4% of low-risk subjects (P < .0002). Overexpression of ER and HER-2/neu occurred in 8% and 19%, respectively of high-risk women; nc low-risk women had these abnormalities. Sixty-eight percent of high-risk women and 7% of low-risk women had abnormalities of one or more of these biomarkers exclusive of cytology. Thirty-one percent of high-risk women, but no low-risk women had abnormalities of two or more biomarkers (P = .0004). Biomarker abnormalities were more frequent with increasing cytologic abnormality. Eighteen percent of women with normal cytology, 29% of women with epithelial hyperplasia and 60% of women with hyperplasia with atypia had abnormalities of two or more biomarkers (P = .048 and < .0001, respectively). Restricting the analysis to those three biomarkers most frequently overexpressed in the high-risk group (ploidy, EGFR, p53), 13% of high-risk women with normal cytology, 20% of high-risk women with epithelial hyperplasia and 51% of high-risk women with atypical hyperplasia had abnormalities of 2 or more of these 3 biomarkers. At a median follow up of two years, 8 of 213 women have been diagnosed with in situ (n = 5) or invasive (n = 3) cancer. Later detection of neoplasia was associated with prior FNA evidence of atypical hyperplasia (P < .0001) and multiple biomarker abnormalities in the 5 test battery (P = .006) by univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, development and/or detection of cancer was primarily predicted by atypical hyperplasia (P = .0047) and secondarily by multiple biomarker abnormalities (P = 0.021). Atypical hyperplasia, EGFR, and p53 in breast FNAs have promise as risk markers and as surrogate endpoint biomarkers for breast cancer chemoprevention trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9027607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  8 in total

1.  p16(INK4a) expression and breast cancer risk in women with atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Derek C Radisky; Marta Santisteban; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Marlene H Frost; Carol A Reynolds; Robert A Vierkant; V Shane Pankratz; Daniel W Visscher; Thea D Tlsty; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-09-15

2.  Germline mutations of TP53 gene in breast cancer.

Authors:  Surekha Damineni; Vadlamudi Raghavendra Rao; Satish Kumar; Rajasekar Reddy Ravuri; Sailaja Kagitha; Nageswara Rao Dunna; Raghunadharao Digumarthi; Vishnupriya Satti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-06-15

3.  Reproducibility of random periareolar fine needle aspiration in a multi-institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Lee G Wilke; Carola Zalles; Victoria Scott; Laura E Archer; Siya Lem; Lisa D Yee; Joanne Lester; Swati Kulkarni; Christine Murekeyisoni; Marie Wood; Karen Wilson; Judy Garber; Carleen Gentry; April Stouder; Gloria Broadwater; Joseph C Baker; Shauna N Vasilatos; Elizabeth Owens; Sarah Rabiner; Abbey C Barron; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Microenvironmental influences that drive progression from benign breast disease to invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena A Cichon; Amy C Degnim; Daniel W Visscher; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  A Cohort Study of p53 Mutations and Protein Accumulation in Benign Breast Tissue and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Kabat; Rita A Kandel; Andrew G Glass; Joan G Jones; Neal Olson; Catherine Duggan; Mindy Ginsberg; Abdissa Negassa; Thomas E Rohan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Suppression of p53 function in normal human mammary epithelial cells increases sensitivity to extracellular matrix-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  V L Seewaldt; K Mrózek; R Sigle; E C Dietze; K Heine; D M Hockenbery; K B Hobbs; L E Caldwell
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Systematic analysis of breast atypical hyperplasia-associated hub genes and pathways based on text mining.

Authors:  Wei Ma; Bei Shi; Fangkun Zhao; Yunfei Wu; Feng Jin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Hoffman; Rod Pellenberg; Catherine Ibarra Drendall; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-06-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.