BACKGROUND: Important management decisions depend on results of the tuberculin skin test. However, the test is subject to several potential errors, and its reliability has not been adequately studied. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reliability of tuberculin skin testing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 96 persons who received a tuberculin skin test. MEASUREMENTS: Ballpoint-pen and palpation measures of induration. RESULTS: Global intra- and interobserver reliability coefficients of the ballpoint-pen technique were high. Five percent of the time, however, a second measurement by the same observer could be at least 2.7 mm less to 3.0 mm more than the first measurement and the measurement from the second observer could be at least 3.4 mm less to 3.7 mm more than the measurement from the first observer. This could lead to the reclassification of a positive test result as negative or vice versa. The area of imprecision was 38% less broad for the ballpoint-pen technique than for the palpation technique. CONCLUSION: Reading of tuberculin skin tests may frequently result in misclassifications when measurements are close to the cutoff point that separates negative from positive results.
BACKGROUND: Important management decisions depend on results of the tuberculin skin test. However, the test is subject to several potential errors, and its reliability has not been adequately studied. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reliability of tuberculin skin testing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 96 persons who received a tuberculin skin test. MEASUREMENTS: Ballpoint-pen and palpation measures of induration. RESULTS: Global intra- and interobserver reliability coefficients of the ballpoint-pen technique were high. Five percent of the time, however, a second measurement by the same observer could be at least 2.7 mm less to 3.0 mm more than the first measurement and the measurement from the second observer could be at least 3.4 mm less to 3.7 mm more than the measurement from the first observer. This could lead to the reclassification of a positive test result as negative or vice versa. The area of imprecision was 38% less broad for the ballpoint-pen technique than for the palpation technique. CONCLUSION: Reading of tuberculin skin tests may frequently result in misclassifications when measurements are close to the cutoff point that separates negative from positive results.
Authors: Benjamin D Fox; Mordechai R Kramer; Zohar Mor; Rachel Preiss; Victoria Rusanov; Leonardo Fuks; Nir Peled; Ilanit Haim; Meir Raz; David Shitrit Journal: Lung Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Adithya Cattamanchi; Rachel Smith; Karen R Steingart; John Z Metcalfe; Anand Date; Courtney Coleman; Barbara J Marston; Laurence Huang; Philip C Hopewell; Madhukar Pai Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Niannian Ji; Neelam Mukherjee; Edwin E Morales; Maggie E Tomasini; Vincent Hurez; Tyler J Curiel; Getahun Abate; Dan F Hoft; Xiang-Ru Zhao; Jon Gelfond; Sourindra Maiti; Laurence J N Cooper; Robert S Svatek Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Karen A Heemstra; Ailko W J Bossink; Roan Spermon; John J M Bouwman; Robert van der Kieft; Steven F T Thijsen Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2012-03-29
Authors: Arjan J Kwakernaak; Pieternella M Houtman; Jan F L Weel; Johanna P L Spoorenberg; Tim L T A Jansen Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 2.980