Literature DB >> 9027143

[Variations in referral to specialized medical centers of the Swiss disability insurance: role of the referring party].

K Dupriez1, J P Vader.   

Abstract

The Commissions of the Swiss Disability Insurance (CDI), in order to evaluate the degree of disability which determines the right to benefits, can call upon Medical Observation Centers (MOCD) for a pluridisciplinary examination. The utilization rate of the MOCD, by the 28 CDI, varies by a factor of 1 to 50. The goal of this study is to identify the causes of this variation related to the differences in CDI practice. The CDI answered a mail survey. For analysis, they are allocated into 3 groups of equal size: Low, medium and high users of MOCD. There is no association between the use of the official and non-official criteria for referral to MOCD and utilization rate of the MOCD. The CDI have a false perception of their MOCD use; 40% of them underestimate it. Considering together the utilization rate of the substitutes and of the MOCD, variation still persists from 1 to 9 among the CDI. There is no difference in the reasons for non-referral to the MOCD according to the level of utilization. This study failed to identify the causes of the utilization differences of the MOCD by the CDI. Other factors should be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9027143     DOI: 10.1007/bf01324289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soz Praventivmed        ISSN: 0303-8408


  11 in total

1.  Comparing the quality of referrals of general practitioners with high and average referral rates: an independent panel review.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus; J Joosten; J Daams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Audit of outpatients: entering the loop.

Authors:  I K Crombie; H T Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-15

Review 3.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

4.  Which rate is right?

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  General practitioner referral rates.

Authors:  M Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-08-13

6.  Understanding variation in rates of referral among general practitioners: are inappropriate referrals important and would guidelines help to reduce rates?

Authors:  A Fertig; M Roland; H King; T Moore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-12-04

7.  Explaining referral variation.

Authors:  A Hutchinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-12-04

8.  [Variations by canton in the use of medical observation centers of the disability-insurance in Switzerland].

Authors:  J P Vader; K Dupriez
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1993

9.  Do general practitioners have different "referral thresholds"?

Authors:  R O Cummins; B Jarman; P M White
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-03-28

10.  Do referral rates vary widely between practices and does supply of services affect demand? A study in Milton Keynes and the Oxford region.

Authors:  A Noone; M Goldacre; A Coulter; V Seagroatt
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.