Literature DB >> 9025996

Architectural and mechanical properties of the rat adductor longus: response to weight-lifting training.

R R Roy1, R Wilson, V R Edgerton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine the effects of an 8 week weight-lifting program on the mechanical, histochemical, and architectural properties of the rat adductor longus muscle, a predominantly slow adductor muscle.
METHODS: The weight-lifting program was progressive such that the rats were performing three bouts of ten lifts with 300% body weight load every other day during the last 3 weeks of training. The in situ mechanical properties, fiber type composition, and architectural characteristics of the muscle were determined in control and weight-trained rats. Intramuscular electromyographic recordings were used to verify the recruitment of the adductor longus during the lifting task.
RESULTS: The adductor longus was composed predominantly of slow fibers (approximately 80% slow oxidative) and had a relatively simple architectural design, i.e., one motor end-plate band near the center of the muscle, virtually no angle of pinnation of the fibers from the line of pull, and a fiber length:muscle length ratio of 0.72. The mean fiber type composition and fiber size, the total fiber number, and the mean physiological cross-sectional area of the adductor longus were similar in the two groups of rats. The mean body weight of weight-lifting rats was significantly less than control. The weight of the adductor longus relative to body weight and its fatigue resistance were higher and the maximum rate of shortening was slower in weight-lifting than in control rats. No other mechanical property was significantly affected by the training program.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that approximately 1 minute of over-load every other day by physiological recruitment of motor units can induce remodeling of the adductor longus of growing rats; i.e., the trained muscles were slower and less fatigable than control. Given that the effects on the architectural or force-generating properties of the muscles were small, the marked improvement in the ability to lift heavier loads as the training progressed appears to be more attributable to neurally related than to muscle-related phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9025996     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199702)247:2<170::AID-AR3>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  6 in total

1.  Diffusive sensitivity to muscle architecture: a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study of the human calf.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefan Maderwald; Kai Uffmann; Armin de Greiff; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Correlations Do Not Show Cause and Effect: Not Even for Changes in Muscle Size and Strength.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Application of a rat hindlimb model: a prediction of force spaces reachable through stimulation of nerve fascicles.

Authors:  Will L Johnson; Devin L Jindrich; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Muscle Hypertrophy in a Newly Developed Resistance Exercise Model for Rats.

Authors:  Hameed Al-Sarraf; Abdeslam Mouihate
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Volitional Weight-Lifting in Rats Promotes Adaptation via Performance and Muscle Morphology prior to Gains in Muscle Mass.

Authors:  Erik P Rader; G Roger Miller; Robert D Chetlin; Oliver Wirth; Brent A Baker
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2014-10-13

6.  Effect of previous strength training episode and retraining on facilitation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and contractile properties after long-term detraining in rats.

Authors:  Sukho Lee; Kwang-Seok Hong; Kijeong Kim
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.