Literature DB >> 9025756

Assessment of cancer recurrence in residual tumors after fractionated radiotherapy: a comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose, L-methionine and thymidine.

M J Reinhardt1, K Kubota, S Yamada, R Iwata, H Yaegashi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study evaluates the midterm follow-up of tumor and normal tissue uptake of deoxyglucose, thymidine and methionine after fractionated radiotherapy to assess cancer recurrence in residual tumors.
METHODS: AH109A tumor-burdened rats were treated with one to eight doses of 5Gy 60Co radiation. Tissue distribution study with 18F-FDG, 3H-thymidine and 14C-methionine, double-tracer autoradiography with 18F-FDG and 14C-methionine, and single-tracer autoradiography with 14C-labeled deoxyglucose, thymidine and methionine were performed 6 days after the end of therapy.
RESULTS: Dose response study shows a significant decrease of tumor uptake of all tracers after two and more doses, even in the case of later recurrence. Whereas 3H-Thd and 14C-Met tumor uptake was similar to that of normal muscle, 18F-FDG tumor uptake remains higher than that of muscle, even in the case of complete tumor cure. The irradiated muscle shows a higher 18F-FDG uptake than the nonirradiated muscle. Autoradiography after eight doses (100% tumor cure) reveals elevated 14C-DG tumor uptake to be ascribable to nonmalignant cellular elements, in particular to a macrophage layer at the rim of necrotic areas. Autoradiography after four and six doses (33% and 57% tumor cure) shows the highest methionine and thymidine uptake in viable cancer cells, whereas deoxyglucose uptake did not differ between viable cancer cells and macrophages.
CONCLUSION: To detect and differentiate viable cancer cells in a residual tumor mass after radiotherapy, PET using 11C-methionine or 11C-thymidine may have some advantages over 18F-FDG, especially if the residual tumor includes larger areas of necrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9025756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Dynamic 11C-methionine PET analysis has an additional value for differentiating malignant tumors from granulomas: an experimental study using small animal PET.

Authors:  Songji Zhao; Yuji Kuge; Min Yi; Yan Zhao; Toshiyuki Hatano; Keiichi Magota; Ken-ichi Nishijima; Masashi Kohanawa; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Specific biomarkers of receptors, pathways of inhibition and targeted therapies: clinical applications.

Authors:  Y Waerzeggers; R T Ullrich; P Monfared; T Viel; M Weckesser; W Stummer; O Schober; A Winkeler; A H Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Benign ulceration as a manifestation of soft tissue radiation necrosis: imaging findings.

Authors:  J M Debnam; A S Garden; L E Ginsberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Tanjore K Narayanan; Viney Jain; Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Joseph Mantil
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  11C-methionine-PET for evaluation of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Koizumi; Tsuneo Saga; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Shigeru Yamada; Mitsuhiko Hasebe; Seiya Ohashi; Sherif Abd-Elrazek; Hiroyuki Ishikawa; Kenji Sagou; Katsumi Tamura; Ryusuke Hara; Hirotoshi Kato; Shigeo Yasuda; Takeshi Yanagi; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Volumetry of [(11)C]-methionine PET uptake and MRI contrast enhancement in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Roland Ullrich; Michael Schroeter; Gereon R Fink; Andreas H Jacobs; Lutz W Kracht
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Impact of FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Imdahl; M Hentschel; M Kleimaier; U T Hopt; I Brink
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  New era of radiotherapy: an update in radiation-induced lung disease.

Authors:  M F K Benveniste; J Welsh; M C B Godoy; S L Betancourt; O R Mawlawi; R F Munden
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  Molecular imaging: 18F-FDG PET and a whole lot more.

Authors:  Todd E Peterson; H Charles Manning
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2009-08-19

10.  Imaging biological activity of a glioblastoma treated with an individual patient-tailored, experimental therapy regimen.

Authors:  N Galldiks; R Ullrich; M Schroeter; G R Fink; L W Kracht
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.