Literature DB >> 9024825

Chronic perioperative steroids and colonic anastomotic healing in rats.

J V Del Rio1, D E Beck, F G Opelka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a rat model of long-term high-dose perioperative steroids and to evaluate the effects of these steroids on a colonic anastomosis in this model.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized.
METHODS: Twenty-six male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 270 to 330 g, were randomized into two groups. The first group (steroid group) (13 rats) received a time-release drug pellet (200 mg cortisone acetate in a 60-day release form) placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the posterior neck for an average daily dose of 3.3 mg. The second group (control group) (13 rats) received a placebo. At 6 weeks, blood cortisol levels were measured, and a colonic anastomosis was performed 2.5 cm distal to the cecum. Steroid group animals also received cortisone acetate (5 mg intramuscularly) immediately before surgery. Colonic bursting strength (mmHg) was measured at the anastomosis site and in the normal distal left colon using a saline infusion system at 8 and 12 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: Blood cortisol levels were significantly higher in the rats in the steroid group than in the rats in the control group. The anastomotic bursting strength was significantly lower in the steroid group at Days 8 and 12. The bursting pressure of the unoperated left colon was not significantly different when the groups were compared. Also, in the steroid group, healing of the pellet insertion wounds in the neck was impaired.
CONCLUSION: The time-release drug pellet is a reliable method of administering long-term steroids. Long-term perioperative steroids impaired colonic anastomotic healing, while normal tissue strength (left colon) was not significantly changed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9024825     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  LigaSure compared with ligatures and endoclips in experimental appendectomy: how safe is it?

Authors:  Levent Elemen; Yusufhan Yazir; Melih Tugay; Alper Akay; Seval Aydin; Karolin Yanar; Süreyya Ceylan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Colonic anastomotic healing in the context of altered macrophage function and endotoxemia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Pantelis; Anke Beissel; Philip Kahl; Tim O Vilz; Burkhard Stoffels; Sven Wehner; Joerg C Kalff
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Perioperative matrix metalloproteinase inhibition therapy does not impair wound or anastomotic healing.

Authors:  James H Balcom; Tobias Keck; Andrew L Warshaw; Bozena Antoniu; Gregory Y Lauwers; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The effect of glucagon-like Peptide-2 receptor agonists on colonic anastomotic wound healing.

Authors:  Heather A Redstone; William D Buie; David A Hart; Laurie Wallace; Pamela J Hornby; Sarah Sague; Jen J Holst; David L Sigalet
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Laparoscopic two-stage operation for rectal cancer with refractory obstructive colitis after kidney transplantation: a case report.

Authors:  Atsuro Fujinaga; Tomonori Akagi; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Kazuhiro Tada; Yusuke Itai; Yohei Kono; Takahiro Hiratsuka; Kosuke Suzuki; Tomotaka Shibata; Yoshitake Ueda; Manabu Toujigamori; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Norio Shiraishi; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.