Literature DB >> 9024265

A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

A B Hodsman1, L J Fraher, P H Watson, T Ostbye, L W Stitt, J D Adachi, D H Taves, D Drost.   

Abstract

Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test this hypothesis, 30 women with osteoporosis, aged 67 +/- 8 yr, completed a 2-yr protocol that comprised 28-day courses of hPTH-(1-34) (800 U) given by daily sc injections; each course was repeated at 3-month intervals. By random allocation, patients either received sequential calcitonin (CT) immediately following the cycle of hPTH-(1-34) (75 U/day, sc; PTH + CT; n = 16) or placebo CT (PTH alone; n = 14) for 42 days. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine site revealed t scores of -3.7 +/- 1.2 (+/-SD) for the PTH alone group and -3.0 +/- 1.4 for the PTH + CT groups, who had 2.0 +/- 2.3 and 1.8 +/- 2.4 vertebral fractures, respectively, at entry to the study. At the end of the 2 yr, the lumbar spine BMD increased from 0.720 +/- 0.130 to 0.793 +/- 0.177 g/cm2 (10.2%) in the PTH group and from 0.760 +/- 0.168 to 0.820 +/- 0.149 g/cm2 (7.9%) in the PTH + CT group. These changes were significant over time in both groups (P < 0.001). Although the final 2-yr lumbar spine BMD was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, those patients receiving sequential CT injections gained bone mass at a consistently slower rate. Changes in BMD at the femoral neck averaged +2.4% and -1.8% in the PTH and PTH + CT groups, respectively, neither of which was significant. In the group receiving only cyclical hPTH-(1-34), the observed 2-yr vertebral fracture incidence was 4.5 compared to 23.0/100 patient yr in the PTH + CT group (P = 0.078). During the first two cycles, changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (serum total alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) and bone resorption (fasting urinary hydroxyproline and N-telopeptide excretion) were significantly increased over pretreatment values after 28 days of hPTH-(1-34) injections (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01 for both groups). Even end of cycle values remained elevated over the study baseline across time (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences for any outcome parameter between the two treatment groups. We conclude that short cycles (28 days) of daily hPTH-(1-34) injections result in significant increases in lumbar spine BMD, without significant changes in cortical bone mass at the femoral neck. Very low incident vertebral fracture rates were documented over 2 yr. However, there is no evidence that sequential antiresorptive therapy with CT is of any benefit over that conferred by cyclical PTH alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9024265     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.82.2.3762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  30 in total

Review 1.  Stemming bone loss by suppressing apoptosis.

Authors:  J M Hock
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Parathyroid hormone treatment improves the cortical bone microstructure by improving the distribution of type I collagen in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Maria-Grazia Ascenzi; Vivian P Liao; Brittany M Lee; Fabrizio Billi; Hua Zhou; Robert Lindsay; Felicia Cosman; Jeri Nieves; John P Bilezikian; David W Dempster
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Parathyroid hormone for the treatment of osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Alexandra Papaioannou; Nicole Zytaruk; David Hanley; Jonathan Adachi; David Goltzman; Timothy Murray; Anthony Hodsman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Management of established osteoporosis.

Authors:  R M Francis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Clinical update on teriparatide.

Authors:  Elizabeth File; Chad Deal
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  The small GTPase RhoA is crucial for MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cell survival.

Authors:  Tomohiko Yoshida; Mary F Clark; Paula H Stern
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.429

10.  Full length parathyroid hormone (1-84) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Esteban Jódar-Gimeno
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.