Literature DB >> 9023209

Dimerization specificity of P22 and 434 repressors is determined by multiple polypeptide segments.

A L Donner1, P A Carlson, G B Koudelka.   

Abstract

The repressor protein of bacteriophage P22 binds to DNA as a homodimer. This dimerization is absolutely required for DNA binding. Dimerization is mediated by interactions between amino acids in the carboxyl (C)-terminal domain. We have constructed a plasmid, p22CT-1, which directs the overproduction of just the C-terminal domain of the P22 repressor (P22CT-1). Addition of P22CT-1 to DNA-bound P22 repressor causes the dissociation of the complex. Cross-linking experiments show that P22CT-1 forms specific heterodimers with the intact P22 repressor protein, indicating that inhibition of P22 repressor DNA binding by P22CT-1 is mediated by the formation of DNA binding-inactive P22 repressor:P22CT-1 heterodimers. We have taken advantage of the highly conserved amino acid sequences within the C-terminal domains of the P22 and 434 repressors and have created chimeric proteins to help identify amino acid regions required for dimerization specificity. Our results indicate that the dimerization specificity region of these proteins is concentrated in three segments of amino acid sequence that are spread across the C-terminal domain of each of the two phage repressors. We also show that the set of amino acids that forms the cooperativity interface of the P22 repressor may be distinct from those that form its dimer interface. Furthermore, cooperativity studies of the wild-type and chimeric proteins suggest that the location of cooperativity interface in the 434 repressor may also be distinct from that of its dimerization interface. Interestingly, changes in the dimer interface decreases the ability of the 434 repressor to discriminate between its wild-type binding sites, O(R)1, O(R)2, and O(R)3. Since 434 repressor discrimination between these sites depends in large part on the ability of this protein to recognize sequence-specific differences in DNA structure and flexibility, this result indicates that the C-terminal domain is intimately involved in the recognition of sequence-dependent differences in DNA structure and flexibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9023209      PMCID: PMC178823          DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.4.1253-1261.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  30 in total

1.  Structural determinants of nuclear receptor assembly on DNA direct repeats.

Authors:  F Rastinejad; T Perlmann; R M Evans; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The crystal structure of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain bound to DNA: how receptors discriminate between their response elements.

Authors:  J W Schwabe; L Chapman; J T Finch; D Rhodes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  On the mechanism of DNA binding by nuclear hormone receptors: a structural and functional perspective.

Authors:  L P Freedman; B F Luisi
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Adaptability at the protein-DNA interface is an important aspect of sequence recognition by bZIP proteins.

Authors:  J Kim; D Tzamarias; T Ellenberger; S C Harrison; K Struhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Specificity determinants for the interaction of lambda repressor and P22 repressor dimers.

Authors:  F W Whipple; N H Kuldell; L A Cheatham; A Hochschild
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Genetic selection for mutations that impair the co-operative binding of lambda repressor.

Authors:  N Benson; C Adams; P Youderian
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Cleavage of the lambda and P22 repressors by recA protein.

Authors:  R T Sauer; M J Ross; M Ptashne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Operator sequences of bacteriophages P22 and 21.

Authors:  A R Poteete; M Ptashne; M Ballivet; H Eisen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1980-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Interactions between DNA-bound repressors govern regulation by the lambda phage repressor.

Authors:  A D Johnson; B J Meyer; M Ptashne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase/promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes.

Authors:  S Tabor; C C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  The preferred substrate for RecA-mediated cleavage of bacteriophage 434 repressor is the DNA-bound dimer.

Authors:  David R Pawlowski; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The bacteriophage 434 repressor dimer preferentially undergoes autoproteolysis by an intramolecular mechanism.

Authors:  Barbara C McCabe; David R Pawlowski; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Effect of salt shock on stability of lambdaimm434 lysogens.

Authors:  Paul Shkilnyj; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Dual sets of chimeric alleles identify specificity sequences for the bE and bW mating and pathogenicity genes of Ustilago maydis.

Authors:  A R Yee; J W Kronstad
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Evidence-Based Structural Model of the Staphylococcal Repressor Protein: Separation of Functions into Different Domains.

Authors:  Kinga Nyíri; Bianka Kőhegyi; András Micsonai; József Kardos; Beata G Vertessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Molecular Mechanisms Governing "Hair-Trigger" Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages.

Authors:  Dolonchapa Chakraborty; Eric Clark; Steven A Mauro; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.