Literature DB >> 9022527

Body fat estimation in late pregnancy and early postpartum: comparison of two-, three-, and four-component models.

J M Hopkinson1, N F Butte, K J Ellis, W W Wong, M R Puyau, E O Smith.   

Abstract

Accurate methods for determining body fat mass during reproduction are necessary to evaluate energy balance. However, determination of fat mass is complicated during pregnancy by the accretion of water, which invalidates assumptions underlying standard two-compartment models. The extent to which the variability in body water during pregnancy invalidates use of pregnancy-corrected two-compartment models for determination of fat mass in individual women is unknown. Moreover, it is unclear whether body water returns to nonpregnant values by 2 wk postpartum, which is frequently used as the baseline in studies of postpartum women. The present study uses a four-component model as a criterion for evaluating two- and three-component models. Fifty-six healthy, normotensive women between the ages of 19 and 35 y were studied at 36 +/- 1 wk gestation and 15 +/- 2 d postpartum. Total body water (TBW), total body potassium (TBK), body density, and bone mineral content were measured by deuterium dilution, whole-body potassium counting, hydrodensitometry, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (postpartum only), respectively. At 2 wk postpartum, hydration and density of fat-free mass (FFM) had not returned to nonpregnant values, and differed between lactating and nonlactating women (P < 0.05). Accordingly, standard TBW and body density estimates of fat mass differed from four-component estimates at both time points (P < 0.005). Moreover, our data indicate that even when pregnancy-specific values for hydration or density of FFM are used in TBW and body density models, individual fat mass estimates may differ by > 3 kg from the four-component value. Fat mass by TBK may differ by > 10 kg from fat mass by the four-component model during pregnancy, and by 6 kg postpartum. Use of standard two-compartment models to estimate fat mass results in significant error both during pregnancy and at 2 wk postpartum. Pregnancy-corrected two-compartment models produce reliable mean fat mass estimates during pregnancy, but individual fat mass estimates may vary widely from four-component values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9022527     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/65.2.432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  14 in total

1.  Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Penny Furness; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hora Soltani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Comparison of multiple methods to measure maternal fat mass in late gestation.

Authors:  Nicole E Marshall; Elizabeth J Murphy; Janet C King; E Kate Haas; Jeong Y Lim; Jack Wiedrick; Kent L Thornburg; Jonathan Q Purnell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Gestation-Specific Changes in the Anatomy and Physiology of Healthy Pregnant Women: An Extended Repository of Model Parameters for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pregnancy.

Authors:  André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Longitudinal changes in adipokines and free leptin index during and after pregnancy in women with obesity.

Authors:  Ulrika Andersson-Hall; Pernilla Svedin; Henrik Svensson; Malin Lönn; Carina Mallard; Agneta Holmäng
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study.

Authors:  U K Møller; S Við Streym; L Mosekilde; L Rejnmark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The influence of lactation on BMD measurements and TBS: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  F M F Grizzo; M de Andrade Pereira; L B M Marchiotti; F Guilhem; T da Silva Santos; C M Dell' Agnolo; W A de Melo; M de Medeiros Pinheiro; M D de Barros Carvalho; S M Pelloso
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Body composition changes in pregnancy: measurement, predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  E M Widen; D Gallagher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Comparison of isotope dilution with bioelectrical impedance analysis among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected pregnant women in Tanzania.

Authors:  R Kupka; K P Manji; E Wroe; S Aboud; R J Bosch; W W Fawzi; A V Kurpad; C Duggan
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  The concurrent validity between leptin, BMI and skin folds during pregnancy and the year after.

Authors:  C L van der Wijden; H A Delemarre-van der Waal; W van Mechelen; M N M van Poppel
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.097

10.  A randomized longitudinal dietary intervention study during pregnancy: effects on fish intake, phospholipids, and body composition.

Authors:  Marja Bosaeus; Aysha Hussain; Therese Karlsson; Louise Andersson; Lena Hulthén; Cecilia Svelander; Ann-Sofie Sandberg; Ingrid Larsson; Lars Ellegård; Agneta Holmäng
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.