Literature DB >> 9022525

Differences in macronutrient selections in users and nonusers of an oral contraceptive.

L H Eck1, A G Bennett, B M Egan, J W Ray, C O Mitchell, M A Smith, R C Klesges.   

Abstract

One of the problems inherent in using women in clinical research is the effect that oral contraceptive (OC) use might have on physical indexes. Although weight gain is frequently reported as a side effect of OC use, there is little empirical evidence that such weight gain actually occurs. The current study investigated differences in energy balance [ie, dietary intake, resting energy expenditure (REE), and physical activity] between groups of users and nonusers of OCs. Each group completed a protocol that covered one menstrual cycle and consisted of daily recording of dietary intake, measurement of REE once during each phase of the menstrual cycle, and reporting of physical activity over the entire cycle. Comparisons indicate that there was a marginal interaction (P = 0.06) of OC use with total energy intake, indicating a different pattern of intake for the two groups. There were qualitative between-group differences such that the OC group consumed a greater percentage of energy as fat (P = 0.02) and a lesser percentage of energy as carbohydrate (P = 0.008). No group differences were found in the percentage of energy consumed as protein, but both groups consumed significantly less protein during menses (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in REE. Both groups of women reported marginally more activity (P = 0.09) during menses than during the luteal phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Biology; Body Weight; Caloric Intake; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Diet; Family Planning; Health; Menstrual Cycle; Menstruation; North America; Northern America; Nutrition; Oral Contraceptives; Physiology; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9022525     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/65.2.419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  6 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of appetite by gonadal steroid hormones.

Authors:  Lori Asarian; Nori Geary
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Ovarian hormones and obesity.

Authors:  Brigitte Leeners; Nori Geary; Philippe N Tobler; Lori Asarian
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 3.  Sex differences in the physiology of eating.

Authors:  Lori Asarian; Nori Geary
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Oestradiol differentially influences feeding behaviour depending on diet composition in female rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Z P Johnson; J Lowe; V Michopoulos; C J Moore; M E Wilson; D Toufexis
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 5.  Understanding the control of ingestive behavior in primates.

Authors:  Mark E Wilson; Carla J Moore; Kelly F Ethun; Zachary P Johnson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Energy Intake and Metabolic Hormones-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Johanna K Ihalainen; Ida Löfberg; Anna Kotkajuuri; Heikki Kyröläinen; Anthony C Hackney; Ritva S Taipale-Mikkonen
Journal:  Endocrines       Date:  2021-04-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.