Literature DB >> 9022435

Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: The outcome of care.

R K McKinley1, D K Cragg, A M Hastings, D P French, T K Manku-Scott, S M Campbell, F Van, M O Roland, C Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of out of hours care given by general practitioners from patients' own practices and by commercial deputising services.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Four urban areas in Manchester, Salford, Stockport, and Leicester.
SUBJECTS: 2152 patients who requested out of hours care, and 49 practice doctors and 183 deputising doctors (61% local principals in general practice) who responded to the requests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status outcome, patient satisfaction, and subsequent health service use.
RESULTS: Patients seen by deputising doctors were less satisfied with the care they received. The mean overall satisfaction score for practice doctors was 70.7 (95% confidence interval 68.1 to 73.2) and for deputising doctors 61.8 (59.9 to 63.7). The greatest difference in satisfaction was with the delay in visiting. There were no differences in the change in health or overall health status measured 24 to 120 hours after the out of hours call or subsequent use of the health service in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients are more satisfied with the out of hours care provided by practice doctors than that provided by deputising doctors. Organisation of doctors into large groups may produce lower levels of patient satisfaction, especially when associated with increased delays in the time taken to visit. There seem to be no appreciable differences in health outcome between the two types of service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9022435      PMCID: PMC2125654          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7075.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  22 in total

1.  Systems for emergency care. Integrating the components is the challenge.

Authors:  J Nicholl; J Munro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

2.  Last night on call; reflection on out-of-hours.

Authors:  David Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Understanding controlled trials: what outcomes should be measured?

Authors:  M Roland; D Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17

4.  Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

5.  So many unanswered questions: the emergency care system of the future.

Authors:  D Pencheon; M Lambert; P Hadridge
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-01

6.  Out of hours service in Denmark: evaluation five years after reform.

Authors:  M B Christensen; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

7.  Patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care.

Authors:  R K McKinley; C Roberts
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

8.  General practice out-of-hours service, variations in use and equality in access to a doctor: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  D O'Reilly; M Stevenson; C McCay; J Jamison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Patients' views on out-of-hours care in general practice in Dublin.

Authors:  S Smith; J Lynch; K O'Doherty; G Bury
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Canadian-French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: methodology and preliminary item scaling results.

Authors:  J M Landgraf; E Maunsell; K N Speechley; M Bullinger; S Campbell; L Abetz; J E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.