Literature DB >> 9022434

Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. I: The process of care.

D K Cragg1, R K McKinley, M O Roland, S M Campbell, F Van, A M Hastings, D P French, T K Manku-Scott, C Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the process of out of hours care provided by general practitioners from patients' own practices and by commercial deputising services.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Four urban areas in Manchester, Salford, Stockport, and Leicester.
SUBJECTS: 2152 patients who requested out of hours care, and 49 practice doctors and 183 deputising doctors (61% local principals) who responded to those requests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to call, time to visit, prescribing, and hospital admissions.
RESULTS: 1046 calls were dealt with by practice doctors and 1106 by deputising doctors. Practice doctors were more likely to give telephone advice (20.2% v 0.72% of calls) and to visit more quickly than deputising doctors (median delay 35 minutes v 52 minutes). Practice doctors were less likely than deputising doctors to issue a prescription (56.1% v 63.2% of patients) or to prescribe an antibiotic (43.7% v 61.3% of prescriptions issued) and more likely to prescribe genetic drugs (58.4% v 32.1% of drugs prescribed), cheaper drugs (mean cost per prescription pounds 3.28 v pounds 5.04), and drugs in a predefined out of hours formulary (49.8% v 41.1% of drugs prescribed). There was no significant difference in the number of hospital admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: By contrast with practice doctors, deputising doctors providing out of hours care less readily give telephone advice, take longer to visit at home, and have patterns of prescribing that may be less discriminating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9022434      PMCID: PMC2125698          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7075.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  17 in total

1.  Management confidence and decisions to refer to hospital of GP registrars and their trainers working out-of-hours.

Authors:  B McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Clinical questions and information needs.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Information for patients.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Knowledge for the clinician. 2. Reference material: books and multimedia packages.

Authors:  J C Wyatt; B Anagnostelis
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Saturday surgeries--do patients feel their needs can be met by alternative out-of-hours care? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Farah Chaudhry; Ashish Kapoor; Stephen Brant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  A Descriptive, Retrospective Study of After-hours Calls in Hospice and Palliative Care.

Authors:  Yun Jiang; Amanda L Gentry; Margaret Pusateri; Karen L Courtney
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 1.918

7.  Last night on call; reflection on out-of-hours.

Authors:  David Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Understanding controlled trials: what outcomes should be measured?

Authors:  M Roland; D Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17

9.  Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

10.  Patients' views on out-of-hours care in general practice in Dublin.

Authors:  S Smith; J Lynch; K O'Doherty; G Bury
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.