| Literature DB >> 9022185 |
V Chumak1, I Bailiff, N Baran, A Bugai, S Dubovsky, I Fedosov, V Finin, E Haskell, R Hayes, A Ivannikov, G Kenner, V Kirillov, L Khamidova, S Kolesnik, G Liidja, I Likhtarev, E Lippmaa, V Maksimenko, A Meijer, V Minenko, L Pasalskaya, J Past, J Puskar, V Radchuk, A Wieser.
Abstract
Intercomparison of EPR-dosimetric techniques using tooth enamel had been performed in order to check whether the results produced by different laboratories are consistent and accurate. Participants were supposed to evaluate doses applied to pulverized enamel samples, using routine techniques from their laboratories. The intercomparison has demonstrated a great variety of methods used for dose reconstruction. Peculiarities of experimental approaches are discussed systematically in terms of procedure for recording the EPR-spectra, determination of the amplitude of the radiation induced signal, determination of the dose, and error propagation.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 1996 PMID： 9022185 DOI： 10.1016/s0969-8043(96)00231-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Radiat Isot ISSN： 0969-8043 Impact factor: 1.513