Literature DB >> 9020457

Joint load considerations in total knee replacement.

M S Kuster1, G A Wood, G W Stachowiak, A Gächter.   

Abstract

Estimates of knee joint loadings were calculated for 12 normal subjects from kinematic and kinetic measures obtained during both level and downhill walking. The maximum tibiofemoral compressive force reached an average load of 3.9 times body-weight (BW) for level walking and 8 times BW for downhill walking, in each instance during the early stance phase. Muscle forces contributed 80% of the maximum bone-on-bone force during downhill walking and 70% during level walking whereas the ground reaction forces contributed only 20% and 30% respectively. Most total knee designs provide a tibiofemoral contact area of 100 to 300 mm2. The yield point of these polyethylene inlays will therefore be exceeded with each step during downhill walking. Future evaluation of total knee designs should be based on a tibiofemoral joint load of 3.5 times BW at 20 degrees knee flexion, 8 times BW at 40 degrees and 6 times BW at 60 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9020457     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  25 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Effect of sex on preactivation of the gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles.

Authors:  R G DeMont; S M Lephart
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Intra-operative femoral condylar stress during arthroscopy: an in vivo biomechanical assessment.

Authors:  Rahel B Schmid; Dieter Wirz; Beat Göpfert; Markus P Arnold; Niklaus F Friederich; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Sports activity after total hip and knee arthroplasty : specific recommendations concerning tennis.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; Munaf M Kachwala; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  [Surface pretreatment of endoprostheses by silica/silane to optimise the hydrolytic stability between bone cement and metal. Total hip and knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Mumme; R Marx; R Müller-Rath; S Gravius; S Andereya; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Modifiable risk factors in knee osteoarthritis: treatment implications.

Authors:  Tsvetoslav Georgiev; Alexander Krasimirov Angelov
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Knee contact force in subjects with symmetrical OA grades: differences between OA severities.

Authors:  C Richards; J S Higginson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The John Insall award: no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julien Wegrzyn; Sebastien Parratte; Krista Coleman-Wood; Kenton R Kaufman; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A novel macroporous polyvinyl alcohol scaffold promotes chondrocyte migration and interface formation in an in vitro cartilage defect model.

Authors:  Kenneth W Ng; Florian Wanivenhaus; Tony Chen; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Aliza A Allon; Valarian D Abrams; Peter A Torzilli; Russell F Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Nanomechanics of Engineered Articular Cartilage: Synergistic Influences of Transforming Growth Factor-β3 and Oscillating Pressure.

Authors:  Arshan Nazempour; Chrystal R Quisenberry; Bernard J Van Wie; Nehal I Abu-Lail
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.