Literature DB >> 9020330

The role of PCR in the diagnosis and management of CMV in solid organ recipients: what is the predictive value for the development of disease and should PCR be used to guide antiviral therapy?

M M Abecassis1, A J Koffron, B Kaplan, M Buckingham, J P Muldoon, A J Cribbins, D B Kaufman, J P Fryer, J Stuart, F P Stuart.   

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. The increased sensitivity of molecular diagnostic techniques (PCR, antigenemia) has resulted in our ability to detect viral replication earlier in the posttransplant period, before the onset of symptoms. With the advent of effective antiviral therapy, "preemptive therapy," guided by sensitive, early and specific predictors of CMV disease, has become a realistic objective. Although multiple studies have analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of these tests, their predictive value for the development of disease has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a positive CMV PCR in the setting of solid abdominal organ transplantation. A total of 476 PCR assays were performed on 134 transplant recipients (102 kidney, 19 kidney/pancreas, 11 liver, 2 other) either as protocol serial samples or as dictated by clinical events. All samples were concomitantly analyzed using standard virological assays for CMV including culture, shell vial, and serology. Patients with any CMV seropositive donor/recipient (D/R) combination received ganciclovir prophylaxis in conjunction with antilymphocyte induction for 14 days. No subsequent CMV prophylaxis was used. The positive predictive value was 55% in all seropositive donor/recipient combinations. The highest risk group (seronegative recipient of seropositive donor) showed the highest positive predictive value, whereas seropositive recipients of either seropositive or seronegative donors showed positive predictive values of 45% and 25%, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100% for all groups. Early detection of CMV infection has important implications for patient management, including preemptive therapy, which can be guided by PCR, especially in high risk (D+/R-) patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9020330     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

1.  Enhanced analytical sensitivity of a quantitative PCR for CMV using a modified nucleic-acid extraction procedure.

Authors:  A Ferreira-Gonzalez; S Yanovich; M R Langley; L A Weymouth; D S Wilkinson; C T Garrett
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Comparative quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in solid organ transplant recipients with CMV infection by using two high-throughput automated systems.

Authors:  R R Razonable; R A Brown; M J Espy; A Rivero; W Kremers; J Wilson; C Groettum; T F Smith; C V Paya
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR in plasma and CMV antigenemia assay: clinical utility of the prototype AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test in transplant recipients.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; K St George; S Y Kao; J Allega; B H Tan; R LaFontaine; L Bui; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay by direct erythrocyte lysis and immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  S K Ho; C Y Lo; I K Cheng; T M Chan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid-organ or stem-cell transplantation. Current guidelines and future prospects.

Authors:  H Hebart; L Kanz; G Jahn; H Einsele
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Peripheral blood leukocytes and serum nested polymerase chain reaction are complementary methods for monitoring active cytomegalovirus infection in transplant patients.

Authors:  Pd Andrade; Mt Fioravanti; Ebv Anjos; C De Oliveira; Dm Albuquerque; Scb Costa
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 8.  Current management strategies for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric transplant recipients.

Authors:  Javier Bueno; Carmen Ramil; Michael Green
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease in the immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  Allison L Baroco; Edward C Oldfield
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-08

Review 10.  Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications.

Authors:  Ananya Das
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.