Literature DB >> 9020218

Hip joint forces during load carrying.

G Bergmann1, F Graichen, A Rohlmann, H Linke.   

Abstract

In some diseases affecting only 1 hip joint, it is necessary to keep the contact force between femoral head and acetabulum (hip joint force) permanently low at the affected side. Six subjects were examined while they were walking and carrying a load in 1 or 2 hands. It was determined how the forces in both hip joints are influenced by the magnitude of the load and the manner in which it is carried. A mathematical model was used to calculate the maximum forces in the frontal plane. One subject had instrumented endoprostheses implanted in both hips. For him the measured values were slightly higher than the calculated ones, but the overall results were similar. Carrying a load on 1 side keeps the force constant at the ipsilateral hip joint or even slightly lowers it. At the same time, there is a large increase on the opposite side. Carrying 25% of body weight with 1 hand causes about 2/3 higher forces in the contralateral joint than on the loaded side. If this load is evenly distributed between the 2 sides, both hip joint forces increase by 25%. In unilateral load carrying, additional relief of the ipsilateral joint can be achieved if the upper body is held upright and the loadcarrying arm is abducted, such as when using a large shopping basket.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9020218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling.

Authors:  G Bergmann; F Graichen; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 3.  Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes?

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

Review 4.  [Hip arthroplasty in the presence of proximal femoral deformity].

Authors:  A Rakow; P Simon; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  In Vivo Damage of the Head-Neck Junction in Hard-on-Hard Total Hip Replacements: Effect of Femoral Head Size, Metal Combination, and 12/14 Taper Design.

Authors:  Massimiliano Baleani; Paolo Erani; Barbara Bordini; Federica Zuccheri; Mateusz Kordian Mąkosa; Dalila De Pasquale; Alina Beraudi; Susanna Stea
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Three-dimensional reduction and finite element analysis improves the treatment of pelvic malunion reconstructive surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Sascha Kurz; Philipp Pieroh; Maximilian Lenk; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumours.

Authors:  Y-M Kwon; S J Mellon; P Monk; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Is lifelong knee joint force from work, home, and sport related to knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Mieke Koehoorn; Jolanda Cibere; Jacek A Kopec
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-17

9.  Experimental and analytical validation of a modular acetabular prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francisco Romero; Farid Amirouche; Luke Aram; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.