Literature DB >> 9020212

Endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery.

J J Regan1, R D Guyer.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques are becoming more widespread in the surgical subspecialties. Standard open surgical procedures are being modified to become less invasive, with the hopes of decreased recovery time, lessened morbidity, and ultimately, cost savings. Improvements in technology have allowed the surgeon to peer into body cavities and create potential spaces such as the retroperitoneum and the neuroforaminal space without the need for traditional extensile surgical approach. Improved fiberoptics, light sources, and the advent of the 3-chip camera and the 3-dimensional camera have resulted in improvements in visualization of the structures surrounding the spine. Although the goals of endoscopic surgery are to maintain or improve visualization and minimize the approach related trauma, procedures must also prove efficacious and safe with at least equivalent results compared with their open surgical counterpart. Not all procedures may be applicable to minimally invasive approaches and just because a procedure can be done does not mean that it should be done. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic spine procedures also depend on the partnership of the spine surgeon with the thoracic or general surgeon with endoscopic experience to ensure patient safety. Proficiency in minimally invasive spinal techniques takes devotion and does not occur after taking minicourses. Practice with cadaver and in vivo models, preceptorship and proctorship training, and ultimately the teaching of these techniques in residency and spinal fellowship programs will undoubtedly lead to favorable outcomes and reduced medical expenditure. Preliminary results are encouraging for endoscopic spinal surgery, but further testing of these new techniques against conventional open procedures will be important in documenting not only the efficacy of the procedure, but also its value in patient satisfaction and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9020212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Thoracolumbar fracture stabilization: comparative biomechanical evaluation of a new video-assisted implantable system.

Authors:  M Schultheiss; E Hartwig; L Kinzl; L Claes; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Solvent-preserved, bovine cancellous bone blocks used for reconstruction of thoracolumbar fractures in minimally invasive spinal surgery-first clinical results.

Authors:  Markus Schultheiss; Michael Sarkar; Markus Arand; Michael Kramer; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lothar Kinzl; Erich Hartwig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Influence of screw-cement enhancement on the stability of anterior thoracolumbar fracture stabilization with circumferential instability.

Authors:  Markus Schultheiss; Erich Hartwig; Lutz Claes; Lothar Kinzl; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  "Does size matter?"A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Najma Farooq; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach.

Authors:  Wan-Kun Hu; Shi-Sheng He; Shao-Cheng Zhang; Yan-Bin Liu; Ming Li; Tie-Sheng Hou; Xiao-Lu Ma; Jian Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Comment regarding "Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films" (A. Hempfing et al.).

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films.

Authors:  A Hempfing; L Ferraris; H Koller; J Rump; P Metz-Stavenhagen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31

9.  Minimally invasive ventral spondylodesis for thoracolumbar fracture treatment: surgical technique and first clinical outcome.

Authors:  Markus Schultheiss; Lothar Kinzl; Lutz Claes; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Erich Hartwig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Role of thoracoscopy for the sagittal correction of hypokyphotic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  E Ferrero; S Pesenti; B Blondel; J L Jouve; K Mazda; B Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.