Literature DB >> 9018315

Computing genetic similarity coefficients from RAPD data: correcting for the effects of PCR artifacts caused by variation in experimental conditions.

W F Lamboy1.   

Abstract

The production of informative random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers using PCR and a single primer is often accompanied by the generation of artifactual (noninformative) bands as well. When RAPD data are used to compute genetic similarity coefficients, these artifacts (false positives, false negatives, or both) can cause large biases in the numerical values of the coefficients. As a result, some workers have been reluctant to use RAPD markers in the estimation of genetic similarities. Artifactual bands are of two types: those caused by variation in experimental conditions, and those caused by characteristics of the DNA to be amplified. A procedure is described that allows for correction of the bias caused by the first type of artifact, providing that replicate DNA samples have been extracted, amplified, and scored. The resulting data are used to obtain an estimate of the proportion of false-positive and false-negatives bands. These values are then used to correct the bias in the computed similarity coefficients. Two examples are given, one in which bias correction is critical to the results, and one in which it is less important. The maximum percent bias, computed from the estimated proportions of false positives and false negatives in the RAPD data set, is proposed as a criterion for determining whether bias correction of the similarity coefficients is required or not. Although all reasonable efforts should be made to optimize PCR protocols to eliminate artifactual bands, when this is not possible, the methods described allow RAPD markers to compute genetic similarities reliably and accurately, even when artifactual bands resulting from variation in experimental conditions are present.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9018315     DOI: 10.1101/gr.4.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PCR Methods Appl        ISSN: 1054-9803


  6 in total

1.  Competition as a source of errors in RAPD analysis.

Authors:  C Halldén; M Hansen; N O Nilsson; A Hjerdin; T Säll
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of scoring error and reproducibility RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance.

Authors:  P Skroch; J Nienhuis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Factors affecting reliability and reproducibility of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting of representative bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  K D Tyler; G Wang; S D Tyler; W M Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Derived Techniques.

Authors:  Kantipudi Nirmal Babu; Thotten Elampilay Sheeja; Divakaran Minoo; Muliyar Krishna Rajesh; Kukkamgai Samsudeen; Erinjery Jose Suraby; Illathidath Payatatti Vijesh Kumar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Differentiation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism of outer membrane protein IB genes.

Authors:  Q C Lau; V T Chow; C L Poh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-12

6.  Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  A van Belkum; J Kluytmans; W van Leeuwen; R Bax; W Quint; E Peters; A Fluit; C Vandenbroucke-Grauls; A van den Brule; H Koeleman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.